Notes

10 Things You Learned In Preschool That Will Help You With Cybersecurity Risk
Cybersecurity Risk Management - How to Manage Third-Party Risks

Every day we learn about breaches of data that have exposed private information of hundreds of thousands perhaps millions. These data breaches are typically caused by third party partners such as a vendor that suffers a system failure.

Information about your threat environment is crucial in defining cyber-related threats. This information lets you identify threats that require your immediate focus.

State-sponsored attacs

If cyberattacks are carried out by a nation-state they are more likely to cause more severe damage than other attacks. Nation-state hackers are typically well-resourced and have sophisticated hacking techniques, making it difficult to identify them or defend against them. As such, they are usually adept at stealing more sensitive information and disrupt vital business services. In addition, they can create more lasting damage by targeting the company's supply chain and harming third-party suppliers.

As a result, the average nation-state attack cost an estimated $1.6 million. Nine out of 10 businesses believe they've been victims of an attack that was backed by a state. With cyberespionage gaining popularity among threat actors from nations-states it's more crucial than ever for companies to have solid cybersecurity practices in place.

Cyberattacks from nation-states may come in many varieties. They can range from ransomware to Distributed Denial of Service attacks (DDoS). They can be performed by government agencies, cybercrime groups that are aligned or contracted by states, freelancers hired to carry out a nationalist operation or even by criminal hackers who target the general public.

The advent of Stuxnet changed the rules of cyberattacks, allowing states to use malware as a weapon and use it against their enemies. Since the time states have used cyberattacks to achieve political goals, economic and military.

In recent years, there has seen an increase in the number and sophistication of attacks sponsored by governments. Sandworm, a group sponsored by the Russian government, has targeted both consumers and businesses with DDoS attacks. This is distinct from traditional crime syndicates that are motivated by the desire to make money. They are more likely to target both consumers and businesses.

Responding to a state actor's national threat requires extensive coordination between various government agencies. This is a significant difference from "your grandfather's cyberattack," where a business might submit an Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) Report to the FBI however, it would not typically require significant coordination with the FBI as part of its incident response process. In addition to the higher degree of coordination responding to a nation state attack also requires coordination with foreign governments, which can be particularly demanding and time-consuming.

Smart Devices

As more devices are connected to the Internet cyber-attacks are becoming more frequent. This increased attack surface can create security risks for businesses and consumers alike. For instance, hackers can exploit smart devices to steal data or even compromise networks. This is especially true when these devices aren't properly protected and secured.

Smart devices are especially attracted to hackers since they can be used to gain an abundance of information about businesses or individuals. Voice-controlled assistants like Alexa and Google Home, for example can gather a large amount about their users based on the commands they receive. They also collect information about the layout of their homes and other personal information. These devices are also used as gateways to other IoT devices like smart lighting, security cameras, and refrigerators.

Hackers can cause serious damage to both businesses and individuals when they gain access to these devices. They can employ these devices to commit a wide range of crimes, such as identity theft, fraud, and Denial-of-Service attacks (DoS). Additionally, they can hack into vehicles to alter GPS locations and disable safety features. They can even cause physical injuries to drivers and passengers.

While it's not possible to stop users from connecting their smart devices, there are steps that can be taken to limit the damage they cause. empyrean corporation can, for instance change the default factory passwords for their devices to prevent attackers finding them easily. They can also enable two-factor authentication. Regular firmware updates are required for routers as well as IoT devices. Local storage, instead of the cloud, can reduce the risk of a hacker when they transfer and the storage of data between or on these devices.


It is necessary to conduct research to understand the impact of these digital harms on people's lives, as well as the best ways to reduce the impact. In particular, studies should be focused on identifying and developing technology solutions to help mitigate the harms caused by IoT devices. Additionally, they should look at other potential risks like those that are associated with cyberstalking or exacerbated power imbalances between household members.

Human Error

Human error is a typical factor that causes cyberattacks and data breaches. This can range from downloading malware to leaving an organization's network open for attack. Many of these errors can be avoided by establishing and enforcing strict security measures. A malicious attachment could be opened by an employee within an email that is phishing or a storage configuration issue could expose sensitive information.

A system administrator may disable a security function without realizing it. This is a frequent error that exposes software to attack by malware or ransomware. IBM states that human error is the main cause of security incidents. It's important to know the kinds of mistakes that could lead to to a cyber-attack and take steps in order to prevent them.

Cyberattacks can be committed for various reasons, such as hacking activism, financial fraud or to steal personal information, disrupt critical infrastructure or vital services of an the government or an organization. They are usually committed by state-sponsored actors third-party vendors or hacker collectives.

The threat landscape is complex and constantly changing. Therefore, organizations have to continuously review their risk profiles and reassess their protection strategies to ensure they're up date with the latest threats. The good news is advanced technologies can reduce an organisation's overall risk of being a victim of a hacker attack and enhance its security posture.

It is important to keep in mind that no technology can shield an organization from every threat. This is why it's crucial to devise an extensive cybersecurity strategy that takes into account the various layers of risk within an organisation's network ecosystem. It's also important to conduct regular risk assessments rather than relying on traditional point-in-time assessments that can be easily missed or inaccurate. A comprehensive analysis of a company's security risks will permit more efficient mitigation of those risks and ensure compliance with industry standards. This will ultimately help prevent costly data breaches and other security incidents from adversely damaging a business's reputation, operations and finances. A successful cybersecurity plan includes the following elements:

Third-Party Vendors

Every business relies on third-party vendors - that is, businesses outside of the company who offer services, products and/or software. These vendors typically have access to sensitive information such as client data, financials or network resources. The vulnerability of these companies can be used to access the business system that they are operating from when they are not secured. It is for this reason that cybersecurity risk management teams will go to great lengths to ensure third-party risks can be vetted and controlled.

The risk is growing as cloud computing and remote working become more popular. In fact, a recent study by security analytics firm BlueVoyant found that 97% of companies they surveyed were negatively impacted by supply chain vulnerabilities. A vendor's disruption even if it only affects a small part of the supply chain, can cause a ripple effect that threatens to disrupt the entire business.

Many organizations have taken to creating a process which accepts new vendors from third parties and requires them to agree to specific service level agreements which define the standards to which they will be held in their relationship with the organization. In addition, a good risk assessment should include documenting how the vendor is tested for weaknesses, then following up on the results, and then resolving them promptly.

A privileged access management system that requires two-factor verification to gain access to the system is a different method to safeguard your company against risks from third parties. This prevents attackers gaining access to your network by stealing employee credentials.

The last thing to do is ensure that your third party providers are using the latest version of their software. This will ensure that they don't have inadvertent flaws into their source code. These flaws are often undetected, and be used to launch additional prominent attacks.

In the end, third party risk is an ever-present threat to any business. The strategies listed above can help reduce these threats. However, the most effective method to reduce the risks posed by third parties is to continuously monitoring. This is the only way to fully understand the security position of your third party and to quickly identify potential risks.

Here's my website: https://empyrean.cash/