Notes

Wikipedia Review Evaluation is an Internet forum and also blog site for the discussion of Wikimedia Structure projects
Wikipedia Testimonial is an Net forum and also blog site for the conversation of Wikimedia Structure jobs, particularly the material and conflicts of Wikipedia. Wikipedia Evaluation is a Wikipedia guard dog internet site, inspecting Wikipedia and reporting on its flaws. It supplies an independent discussion forum to review Wikipedia editors and their influence on Wikipedia material. At its optimal, individuals consisted of current Wikipedia editors, previous Wikipedia editors, individuals prohibited from Wikipedia, and also people that had never ever modified.

The website was founded in November 2005 by "Igor Alexander", and held by ProBoards. On 19 February 2006 it moved to its own domain making use of Invision Power Board software. Visit This Page required enrollment utilizing a legitimate e-mail address to upload and also blacklisted e-mail companies that permitted privacy so as to prevent the procedure of numerous accounts by a single customer.

Wikipedia Testimonial was pointed out for its discussion of wiki-editing ideas and also its participation in the examination of the Palo Alto Research study Company's WikiDashboard.

Discourse
Wikipedia Evaluation is not a conspiracy, a team-building workout, a parlor game, or an experiment in collusion. It is not suggested as a resource or training school for those that would impart anxiety and suffering in others. It does not exist to corrupt, however to reveal corruption; it does not exist to take apart organizations, but to expose the ways in which organizations are taken apart; it does not exist to dislike, but is implied to expose hate in others. To reveal these things is not wicked. He Has A Good Point is not a monolithic entity, neither the sum of its parts. Like-mindedness does not suggest selfhood of function; regard for the rights of one group does not suggest disrespect for the rights of one more. It is not planned to be predictable, constant, or dull.

Imagine a world in which human beings are not customer accounts, are not programmable, and are not simple words on a display screen. That's what we're doing ...

-- Statement made when the website was out of service in 2008, Wikipedia Evaluation
Seth Finkelstein wrote in The Guardian that Wikipedia Review has given a prime focus for examination right into Wikipedia-related matters such as the "Essjay debate". Cade Metz, writing for The Register, attributed Wikipedia Evaluation with the exploration of a private subscriber list that led to the resignation of a Wikipedia manager; he likewise created that a Wikipedia proposal called "BADSITES" intended to outlaw the reference of Wikipedia Review and similar websites on Wikipedia. The Independent noted that "allegations against certain administrators capped on a website called Wikipedia Review, where individuals dispute the administrators' activities." The Irish innovation website Silicon Republic suggested going to Wikipedia Evaluation in order to "follow disputes, conversations, editors and also basic bureaucracy on Wikipedia". Philip Coppens used blog posts made on Wikipedia Evaluation to assist construct a record, released in Nexus Magazine, on WikiScanner and also allegations that knowledge firms had actually been utilizing Wikipedia to spread out disinformation.

Web content and also framework
Wikipedia Evaluation's openly easily accessible online forums are separated into four basic topic locations:

Discussion forum information;
Wikimedia-oriented discussion, which consists of subforums focusing on editors, the Wikipedia bureaucracy, meta discussion, short articles and basic Wikimedia-focused subjects not fitting elsewhere;
Media discussion forums containing a news feed as well as discussion regarding news as well as blogs featuring Wikipedia/Wikimedia; as well as
Off subject, non-Wikimedia relevant conversation.
References

Website: https://kikonline.ru/partner/kak-pomoch-blizkomu-cheloveku-sbrosit-ves/