Notes

Alien Profiteering for Cosmic Engineering
Aliens, as in cosmic visitors, provokes all types of human reactivity. Here, the characterization has nothing to do with human creatures seeking asylum or other amenities from a host country. Instead, the focus is interplanetary. Likewise, traveling the universe inspires a variety of notions. Concerning how such things happen, science collides with science fiction. Many questions arise. With that, a number of have opinions. Yet, bottom-line, among humans thinking about this particular field of query, as in questions usually asked by criminologists, who stand to profit. That is to say, for all those in the realm of investigative inquiry, where is the gain. That comes from the classical spectrum of criminology, coping with victim, suspects and perpetrators.

In the business of selling one theory after another, particularly those of an extraterrestrial variety, there's exceptional profit potential. Taking advantage of ignorance, paranoia and primordial self-interests, provides lucrative remunerations for skillful entrepreneurs. Setting aside the vast array of conspiracy theories, the "alien agenda" attracts much interest by a lot of people. From successful novels to television Sci-Fi portrayals, "ufology" is extraordinarily popular with huge segments of the populace. In fact, much of what of the speculation about other worldly visitors originates from fictional sources. You can start out with early western space fiction in the late 19th century. Creative authors imagined fascinating cosmic adventures.

From there, any assessment of the profit potential in storytelling, since it pertains to alien travelers, is likely a great deal of guesswork. However, there is an illusion among some writers. For the writer, regarding the potential for moneymaking from writing stories about science fiction and fantasy, the probability is enormous success is low. On the production side, for an assortment of individual and corporate media companies, the potential is slightly different. With the web, as well as various competing streaming services, conspiracy theories abound in a variety of forms. According to one prominent financial news source, media services eagerly promote "conspiratorial concepts". If it sells, it does not matter what the data shows, or the scientific validation.

Accordingly, one traditional magazine put the estimate of "UFO believers" in the range around two thirds of the American population. The probability of a higher correlation is probably an excellent assumption. Therefore, approximately three from every four Americans accept the notion of alien lifeforms, with roughly one in three believing aliens have visited earth.

Considering that belief systems vary, and motivations are diverse, one aspect that stands out permeates the social strata. Making a living from "UFO phenomena. One online blog shows that not everyone profits, however, many do very well. By writing books, gaining a following and grabbing international notoriety, alongside media promotions, several make the genre lucrative. In furthering the discussion concerning the "alien agenda", another aspect involves constructing a cosmos teaming with life everywhere. This idea, aside from any monetary advantages of one person or another, is really a more fascinating temptation. One online science forum for example mentioned the "Fermi Paradox". This suggest the contrast between the insufficient scientific evidence and the probability of other life forms in the cosmic order. Where will be the aliens?

Better yet, where may be the data? Put simply, what scientific hardcore validation produces the viability of proof beyond any doubt? Perhaps in post-modern America that's too extreme. Forget website about evidentiary criteria. Presently there appears a resurgence of not merely anti-intellectualism, but also anti-science thinking. Mere speculation based on eyewitness testimony, for example, is insufficient. Logically speaking, bias influences conclusions at every opportunity, as the observer influences her or his observations. Opinions, rumors, hearsay, and gossip offer nothing of consistent provable data to substantiate probabilities. As suggested by one scientist, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

As to science, here the inference is in favor of those areas such as astrophysics, astronomy, biology, chemistry, and physics to name several. Often, some call this realm the "hard sciences". Meanwhile, in the alleged "soft sciences", or protestations of the pseudosciences, philosophies thrive in the areas of criminology, psychology, sociology and theology. While a few freely admit the sphere of the "social studies" areas aren't hard sciences, others cringe, as they desperately want consideration as a "scientist". In that dominion, debates can rage concerning whom may be the most scientific, others can assess who cares. Regardless, evidence remains critical.

In the imaginative processes of thinking, many people are quite creative. Up to now, for a majority of alien adherents, the inventiveness of cosmic engineering designs a universe teeming with all kinds of life forms. With billions of possible habitats, why not? Unfortunately, again hard evidence will not suffice the near religious conviction of science fiction enthusiasts. In this reference, several researchers provide commentary for the assertion that alien aficionados pursue a "theological" conviction for advanced cosmic species. Elevated to a divine state of intergalactic supremacy, believers place humans in a subservient role to alien ascendancy.

For this discussion, the word "profit" is not limited by the monetary incentive alone. Instead, the application form applies to any form of gain produced from promoting, advocating or otherwise proselytizing a cosmic or supernatural perspective. Notably, this doe not mean there's anything wrong with any belief system as an individualized personal point of view. At least for the moment, in America, everyone is entitled to his outlook. Alternatively, when "profitability" and intolerance for opposing perspectives enter the public arena, problems arise. Disputes and disagreements in communal discourse ought to enable the reasonable engagement. Frequently, in contemporary mainstream, dangerous condescension quickly devolves discussion.

Regardless, conspiracy theories of one form or another abound in great abundance, particularly in the allegedly "highly educated" U.S. population. Revisit that for a moment. Logical skepticism, reinforced by scientific and forensic analysis seems woefully deficient in the "postmodern" American framework. Although some potentially maintain amazing brilliance in niche or domain subsets, regions of particular expertise, outside that, ignorance astounds the few. From alien DNA creating humans to 21st century "sociopolitical tribalism", many pursue a claim to fame. Fake news, scheming hoaxes and all manner of hucksterism manifest an array of con artistry.

In a devolving society, allowing that supposition for as soon as, not much in terms of intellectual advancement has a high probability of exception. The vast stretches to global ramifications further the conceptualization of an intellectually eroding population. Regarding the opportunistic possibilities, criminals of every sort benefit from targets of opportunity. Social media is rife with foolish pretentiousness of "tubular selfie-isms". By "tubular", the verbiage intends reference to those who wish to demonstrate themselves in a podcast recreation of these. For "them", metaphorically inferring an alternative form of self-centeredness.

A tube, a podcast, a video channel in a few streaming service boasts the superficially of limited knowledge and understanding of the mysteriousness surrounding the planet. Not to forget of course, the nature of exceptionality. Yet, exceptions to a concept of rampant social media foolishness, and the spread of erroneous commentary, is a small percentage. At critical junctures of communal battles for truth versus fiction, where facts become annoying distractions, desired needs for self-validation rage rampantly. Mental conflicts struggle against the realization that growing up and developing mature self-evolving transition requires extraordinary discipline. For most people, adolescence embraces the cowardice of refusing to transform. Personal liberation in every facet of individual ideation is a frightening prospect for nearly everyone.

Again, exceptionality applies. Disengagement from the status quo, the contrived consensus and the enforced normality, is psychically rebellious and invites retaliation. Whatever means "normal" depends on the range of communal acceptance. At any moment, resistance isn't futile in the sense that acceptance of consequences is understood. Yet, many cowards creep the landscape of social interactivity. From selfie neediness in self-promoting "tube shows", to pretentious pontifications of "opining blogs", the ruse of anti-science faux intellectualism fogs the atmosphere of social discourse. Foolishness abounds with rabid proliferation via superficial mimicry in the excessive use of techno gadgetry. Ignorance in self-importance wears many disguises.

In echoes of days gone by, an assertion that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, for some that is quickly overshadowed by retaliatory invective. In response to a probable rational inquiry, hunting for the evidentiary validation, many will do little to expand, enhance or elsewhere enrich their innate abilities beyond the pseudo-intellectual babble of social media. For none of those with the energy to exemplify an enlightened ascendency will demonstrate exceptionality of honorable personality. Its too personal, much material gain or psychic fame profane any inclination to the bravery of differentiation. Selfishness is much too critical an important necessity for many, or even most often the attendant example. The blasphemy of stupidity spreads everywhere.

For the serious, in other words, the mature grownup and self-evolving investigator, profound non self-serving objectivity is a powerful force to harness. As bias most always influences the conjecture of generalized conclusions. An observer of phenomenon typically infuses subsequent notions with his or her bias, prejudices and personal dysfunctions. In the pseudosciences, the "social studies" arena, particularly criminology, psychology, sociology and theology, extraordinary bias promotes a diversity of nebulous notions. Anecdotal speculation, opined self-importance, and exaggerated so-called "peer review" blur the efficacy of scientific validation.
Meanwhile, maturity keeps watch near the playpen in the nursery of infantile ideas.

Maturation in the investigative process moves beyond the resume', or the cv in the unnecessary advocacy of personal adulation. No title or rank supersedes the vitality of hardcore X-rated, in the facial skin flush of provable scientific sufficiency. Nonetheless, the wonderful world of creative fiction, in movies, television, books and short stories, portrays the improbable because the probable. For which, many, including those that ought to know better, salaciously desire the fiction of "fact". Subjective validation in hopefulness for the fabrication to be reality permeates the vast reaches of the societal mainstream. Social media marketing enjoys complicity.

Because of the abundance of fake news, social media distortion and mainstream media sales propaganda, profiteering on ignorance is incredibly lucrative. Such deliberate status quo enforcement of ideological superficiality and ethical inconsistency contrives a diversity of intellectual challenges. While this remains one dimension of foolish narcissism, the infantile self-interests span many other spectrums of societal connectedness. Within multigenerational life cycles, other dimensional factors collusively mix educational processes, institutional environments, governmental mechanisms, and different types of consumptive consumerism. Along with the vast reach of entertainment venues, movies and television play a big role.

The discerning inquisitor faces monumental quests in sifting through the massive levels of data to uncover the reality of factual authenticity. Each day in every techno way, streams of sound bites filled with ads, commercials, apps, promos, etc., fog the awakened state of consciousness. Alleged documentaries, pretentious "news" stories, and movie making science fiction boast a number of other worldly manifestation. There exists a reason fiction is called fiction, particularly when it comes to the realm of pseudoscience. It's a fabrication, untruth and deliberate misrepresentation of reality. Yet, a lot of people will accept fictional portrayals as seemingly quasi-truthfulness. Few people insist upon a reasonable level of skepticism and a wholesome sense of objectivity.

In the 21st, belief in the paranormal, the supernatural and the extraterrestrial is continuing to grow. Ghosts, goblins, gremlins and little green space creatures garner daily attention across a broad swath of society. According to a significant university study in 2015, in spite of advances in the technology, the vast majority of the population cling to a number of supernatural beliefs. More than two thirds, or abut 73% of the American population have confidence in "other worldly" manifestations. According to that study, along with others, "alien issues", from UFO's to abductions and visitations, fall within those beliefs. As conspiracy theories abound, aliens play a central role in the deception.

The profit is in the prophet, and the prophecy may be the conspiracy for the fabrication of wishful thinking. Realizing of course that "profit" has many aspects, from the psycho realm to the vast sphere of materiality. Transcending the metaphorical implication of alien profiteering for cosmic engineering, the inference inclines toward the multiplicity of illicit conspiracies. Rampant through the entire west in particular, where intellectual achievement is a hallmark of social blaster and academic blather, remains the salacious gratification of conspiratorial flirtations. In the macabre fascination of politicians, pundits and priestly proselytes, the unscientific and inexperienced "influencers", most will pursue the misdirection of these celebrity worship.

For so long as gain may be the sensual claim to fame, the essence of rational reality devolves to they mystic notions of collective gratification at any cost. A kind of cosmic collective hedonism spreads throughout social media marketing as though many people are "expert" in the diverse realm of the sciences. Not just that, but a mere selfish framework of ideological totalitarianism sweeps the "infotainment" networks in counterproductive intolerance. In general, the "alien conspiracy" aids the widespread conglomeration of 1 fake claim after another, and is representative of a devolving culture. As some would assert, lots of people willingly surrender good sense for self-interest.

Concerning "alien profiteering", this is a typecast, a euphemism, and a reworded understatement of public pabulum to pacify the ignorance of a devolving age. Collectively hedonist, the rush to take endlessly all types of "self-medicating" escapism, an externality of blame and shame degrades the nature of truthful investigative intellectual processes. Not to be observed as different, accepting the status quo unquestionably, embracing unproved consensus, and cowering in complicity, most will assemble in the crowded halls of hasty generalizations. To satiate fears instead of advance intellectual ascension, emotional reactivity evades logical consistency.

Nonetheless, the gurus of material gain, perpetrate the sleight of hand legerdemain whenever profitably possible. There will always be followers without question who willfully pursue their very own confirmation bias in the illusion of personal affirmation. In a single study, a flashback to the past suggested that scholars, from the sphere of anthropological investigation, nearly 75 years ago, predicted that "irrational supernatural" thinking would erode toward higher reaches of rational scientific investigative inquiry. However, this type of prediction, instead, faded to the continual rise of the hunt for phantoms, ghosts, and Martians. Logical thinking suffers painfully.

One study suggests, out of an academic pursuit, that normality for Americans carries a strong belief in other worldly things. Seemingly, a conjecture might claim that for many individuals, believing in themselves in not just a particularly vital factor. Instead, embracing things beyond your extraordinary nature of human potential is preferred. As intellectual pursuits slowly fade, the enormous reliance on social media, techno-gadgetry and magical thinking, takes the area of critical analysis.

With the massive option of "cosmic" entertainment means, like books, movies, television shows, and so forth, it really is all too easy to let others do the thinking. Binge watching the "magic" unfold in a pseudoscientific drama, while clinging to the rush of cell phone digitation, supplies the wonderfully shallow fulfillment of amative excitation. As celestial dimensions of biased intentions satiate alien profiteering for cosmic engineering reality fades to the shadows.

Randy Gonzalez, 40 year veteran of regulations enforcement community. College professor of police operations.
Read More: https://fortleeortho.com/things-to-consider-before-buying-power-tools/