Notes

Because it seems to me that what you wrote in your last article is absurd, imaginary and completely ridiculous. Your obnoxious words evoke enormous controversy, not only to me but also to the multitude of people. While writing this article you should be associated with responsibility which are connect with it  and understand the misunderstanding from the point if view readers because for me this article is not only offended a lot of people but it is also written obscenely and racist. I hope you will listen to me with compassionate and that I will change your point of view on this paramount matter.

The first thing that I would like to raise are the words which you used to described the refugees. Did not you think that in such a thoughtless way you offended a lot of people? It is a really inconsiderate and not sophisticated way to express yourself in this situation.Using words like 'they are defect for our nation ... We need to emigrate them as soon as possible ... why do we need them, we have to do something with it- It cannot be like that'. You not only hurt them but equally you make them rebel. Some  you rebelling against you and the whole newspaper some against refugee - if that's what you meant then congratulations. If you think that they would 'destroy our country' you are wrong, you are wrong because by people like you country and even the world becomes worse. It is sorrowful because you do not realize what you are doing. Do you know that you not only hurt people but also destroy them. Why? Because the people believe what they read. All in all, if something is in the newspaper, at least in part, it must be true. Even if it is not. Maybe you know that you and a few people, but what about the rest? What are they thinking in such situations? Have you ever wondered about that? Ultimately, you impact on many people. By contrast, instead of influence them positively you affect them adversely. But why? What did you think when you wrote 'there is no place for them'? What? In this case I want to say that you should think through what you write because it has a huge impact on readers. You should know that you have a moral responsibility and you should be very careful.

The second thing to which I would like to refer is multiculturalism in the UK. You described it as a considerable defect nevertheless it is not; Everyone knows that the advantage of our country is the diversity. And that is why our country is unique. Other countries through this recognize us. We do not live in a country where live just Britons but in the country where live a lot of people from countless countries. Almost half of all ethnic minority Britons live in London. Much debate focuses on the 300 languages spoken in the capital's schools, and the unique mixture of cultural assets and social problems this creates for the 'global city'. Historically, British people were believed to be descended from the varied ethnic stocks that settled there before the 11th century; the Celts, Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Norse and the Normans. It shows that Britain's identity was always multicultural. And namely it is our duty to take as much as possible refugees to our country because this people come to us when they need help; it our country is salvation. I think you should take it to consciousness because it is our duty to help other people. And if you do not accept it, please can you at least accept it because it is also your country. And precisely you insult it by that we do not accept his greatest asset. I hope you will understand that you live in a country where multiculturalism is a colossal advantage.