Notes

Why Bother Reading the most recent Research When Online Tech Magazines Summarize EVERYTHING?
Reading popular tech magazines and high tech magazines online saves considerable time. No one has the time to go through all the scientific journals and read papers on every subject. Research papers are produced now in such mass quantity, and often universities and researchers are doing exactly the same forms of studies getting similar results, and each of their papers is published in a separate or different journal.

The other day someone had given me hook critique and explained that the data I had on various subjects was not as good as his because he browse the actual scientific journals, and I only browse the tech magazines summaries. That's not exactly true, I read both, but the summary type articles in a much higher percentage of course. Okay so, let's explore this thought for a second shall we?

First, there is no way that one individual can read all of the scientific journals in every the different areas of science. Therefore by Additional info reading the scientific articles and those journals he could be limited in the amount of information he consumes. Further, easily read and scan hundreds of tech magazines summaries each day I can follow each of the regions of science, and anything notable that catches the eye of a science writer. Indeed, in explaining this to my acquaintance he dismissed my notion, but I also told him that I possibly could always research the scientific research in the Journal easily read something that I needed to pursue further.

Now then, for anyone who is working in a very limited niche of science then perchance you get aggravated reading a few of the tech magazines summaries. Usually the writers fail, or don't fully understand the topic they are writing about. And since you know a lot concerning the individual niche subject matter you can spot mistakes immediately. I noted that those research folks often leave comments explaining how a popular magazine science writer got it wrong, and what the paper actually says, and what the study indeed means.

Still, to get into that discussion and debate, that is also online in those popular magazine science articles, you must go and read them, and then read the comments in the bottom. Once you read a scientific journal, you may or may not obtain the follow up comments until the next issue. It appears the tech articles are a better way to communicate through summarizing. I'm sure although you may read actual journal articles you will admit that you do many skipping and skimming as time is valuable, which means you are really only reading be summary, conclusion, and abstract anyway - so what's the difference?

For those of us that need to know a lot in regards to a lot of things, it seems if you ask me that reading these summaries in the popular magazines or in the web news is just about the better way to go. So, I hereby completely dismiss the critique of these that are not of exactly the same view. Please consider all of this and think on it.

Lance Winslow has launched a fresh provocative group of eBooks on Future Concepts. Lance Winslow is really a retired Founder of a Nationwide Franchise Chain, and now runs the Online Think Tank;
Homepage: https://josefsen-medina.mdwrite.net/why-bother-reading-the-most-recent-research-when-online-tech-magazines-summarize-everything