Notes

The Battle Over Online Privacy And How To Win It
Users needed to alter an extra, separate setting to stop place information from being conserved to their Google account. They required to browse to "Web & App Activity" and pick the Don't save my Web & App Activity in my Google Account, even if they had currently chosen the Don't save option under the Location History.

Is Online Privacy With Fake ID A Scam?
Customer supporters reacted to the Federal Court's findings, stating that this is an important success for customers, specifically anyone worried about their privacy online, as the Court's decision sends a strong message to Google and others that big businesses must not deceive their consumers.

Google has since altered the way these settings are presented to consumers, however is still accountable for the conduct the court discovered was likely to misguide some affordable consumers for 2 years in 2017 and 2018.


This is the 2nd current case in which the customer supporter has prospered in developing deceptive conduct in a company's representations about its use of customer data. In 2020, the medical appointment booking app HealthEngine confessed had actually divulged more than 127,000 patients' non-clinical personal info to insurance brokers without the notified authorization of those patients. HealthEngine paid fines of millions, for this misleading conduct.

The Biggest Myth About Online Privacy With Fake ID Exposed
The customer supporter has two comparable cases in the wings, consisting of another case concerning Google's privacy-related notices and a case about Facebook's representations about a supposedly privacy-enhancing app called Onavo.

In bringing procedures against business for misleading conduct in their privacy policies, the consumer advocate is following the US Federal Trade Commission which has actually sued many US companies for misleading privacy policies. The consumer advocate has more cases in the future about information privacy.

Can this solve the issue of complicated and unfair privacy policies? The ACCC's success against Google and HealthEngine in these cases sends out an important message to business: they should not mislead consumers when they publish privacy policies and privacy settings. And they might get considerable fines if they do.

This will not be sufficient to stop companies from setting privacy-degrading terms for their users, if they spell such conditions out in the fine print. Such terms are presently commonplace, even though customers are progressively concerned about their privacy and want more privacy alternatives.

Consider the US experience. The US Federal Trade Commission brought action versus the developers of a flashlight app for releasing a privacy policy which didn't reveal the app was tracking and sharing users' location info with third parties. However, what about registering on those "uncertain" online sites, which you will probably use once or twice a month. Give them imitation detailed information, considering that it may be required to sign up on many websites with assumed info, several individuals might also want to consider #links#!

However, in the agreement settling this claim, the service was for the developers to reword the privacy policy to disclose that users' place and gadget ID data are shared with third parties. The concern of whether this practice was legitimate or proportionate was ruled out.

Significant changes to American privacy laws will likewise be required prior to companies will be avoided from pervasively tracking consumers who do not want to be tracked. The existing review of the federal Privacy Act could be the start of a procedure to acquire fairer privacy practices for consumers, but any reforms from this evaluation will be a long period of time coming.

Website: