Notes

Maybe Food Stamps?

The article has been shared less than 20,000 times since it was first published today. This indicates that it is receiving a lot of attention. Let's look at it again.



The teen girl who sent explicit and sexually explicit text messages with former Rep. Anthony Weiner lied about her age and political motivations to harm Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, according to an investigative news site WhoWhatWhy.



In a report released Monday, the website stated that the girl who exchanged the messages with Weiner was closer to 17 and not 15 as first reports said. That also puts her above the age of consent in North Carolina, which is 16. Note the word "report". The WhoWhatWhy unsourced hit-piece is not described as a story or report, but instead as report. It makes it sound...official. According to posts on social media the girl also claimed that she and her family were not Clinton supporters. According to the report, the girl contacted Weiner.



The website suggests that this could suggest that Weiner was the subject of a politically motivated plot. "Seeing that Weiner is both a frequent offenders, and is linked to one of the most influential individuals in Clinton's inner circleof friends, it's possible that this was a plan from the beginning with the goal to humiliate the Clinton campaign," reads the WhoWhatWhy report.



The investigation of Weiner and his accuser led the FBI to announce a few days prior to Election Day that it was investigating Clinton's use of an email server in private while she was secretary of state. It did so because it found a few of Clinton's emails on Weiner's computer, some of which were sent to him by his wife, Human Abedin, a long-time aide to Clinton.



Clinton lost the election and many in her camp blamed the FBI and its former director, James Comey.



Weiner this week pleaded guilty to a charge of distribution of obscene material to a minor, which can carry the possibility of 10 years in prison.



WhoWhatWhy is a nonprofit investigative website... Ah, "non-profit"! Leftists interpret this as code for "You can trust them," because everyone on the Left knows that the desire to make money automatically means that you're an eeeeebil.



I wonder how their staff pay their rent and buys food? Maybe food stamps? EBT cards? I doubt it. There's money, salaries. You can track the money to find out who these scumbags are. They're not doing it for free I swear. It's an "forensic journalism" company that is aiming to uncover the truths that people who are interested in the issue are trying to hide. Its chief editor and CEO is Russ Baker, who has written for The New York Times, The New Yorker and The Washington Post. Baker is also the author of a book titled The Family of Secrets, that claims to have connections between the Bush family and historic events like Watergate during the time of former Nixon's presidency.



The WhoWhatWhy report, citing a court document that says the girl was only shy of 17 when she approached Weiner and not 15 as The Daily Mail cited when it first reported the story. https://sexting.ink/ This "lie" is said to be "clearly designed to generate maximum public anger and to cause Weiner in greater legal trouble."



WhoWhatWhy provides a variety of social media messages and photos to suggest that the victim was from a Republican-friendly family and that this suggests a political ploy could have been involved. It says that the victim was a fan of Trump's victory on social media, that her father is registered Republican and that "her mother tweeted a snarky comment about the Black Lives Matter movement." "It's not yet clear if the motive was mostly money, a plot to smear Clinton or both," the report notes. So, a major Democrat-supporting organ cites a "report" claiming the whole Weiner/sexting-teen-girl/his-laptop-held-600,000-Hillary-emails thing was a setup, eh?



This is a serious understatement. It suggests that neither Weiner's high-priced law firm or the FBI investigated the girl's age when it could have been used to aid in the complete debunking of the "underage" charge. Democrats, was Hilly part of the plot against Hilly's FBI? This would be plausible, given that the FBI was a part of Trump. But, oooh wasn't the President of the FBI back then.



Oooh, yeah, dat's right.



Maybe Loretta Lynch was maybe a Trump supporter. Yeh, dat's it.



Recognize it.



While Weiner's sexting did get police involved however, what prompted Comey to reopen the investigation into Hillary's emails wasn't Weiner sexting the girl he believed to be 15 years old. It was the fact that when the FBI searched his laptop, they discovered tens of thousands emails from Hillary, some of which were classified.



Unless the girl and her handlers had impressive amount of ESP, how did they know that there were Hillary emails on her husband's laptop? (Recall that all Weiner's "sexting" was carried out via phone texts.)



So why would leftist Russ Baker be taking the time to run this story now, after the election has been a long time ago? It's likely part of the campaign against Trump by eliminating enough GOP senators to give Dems the chance to remove Trump following impeachment.


My Website: https://sexting.ink/