Notes

[begin quote]

"There was never and there isn't a shred of evidence that there was an
Aryan invasion of India of any kind; the logistical and physical geographical and
geological and even archeological evidence just doesn't add up and
neither does the linguistic or genetic evidence.

Firstly there is a decrease in complexity of Indo-European languages as
you go from India to Europe; Lithuanian is the oldest of the Indo-European langauges, and yet Lithuanian does not even come close to the level of complexity and hugeness that is the original Sanskrit language; not to mention that Sanskrit has terms and words that are completely Indic in origin that is NOT found in the other Indo-European languages. Sanskrit is the oldest of the Indo-European languages by far which negates AMT.

Secondly, R1a the genetic haplogroup associated with the spread of
Indo-European languages to Europe, ORIGINATED IN INDIA AND SOUTH ASIA
BEFORE IT TRAVELED TO EUROPE FROM CENTRAL ASIA! There was an OUT OF INDIA MIGRATION INTO EUROPE INSTEAD OF THE REVERSE, which was proved by geneticist Spencer Wells. The biggest diversity of the genetic
haplogroup R1a is found IN INDIA AND SOUTH ASIA AND NOWHERE ELSE! R1a is found even among tribals and different caste groups in India/South Asia
other then the so called Northern part of India or middle to upper
castes. West Bengali "upper castes" have some of the highest R1a % in
the entire world, and yet Bengal was not a large site for an Aryan
migration historically. This contradicts AMT completely and negates it!

Thirdly, there is no actual archeological or skeleton evidence of any
type of an invasion or population migration movement occurring into
India in ancient times, rather the Indus Valley civilization was faced
with a spread ecological drought and disaster that that de-urbanized the
civilization and forced them to mass migrate to the rest of the
sub-continent as well as Central Asia and the Middle East hence the Out
of India theory which HAS BEEN PROVED BY ACTUAL GEOLOGISTS AND
SCIENTISTS!


Fourthly the Indus Valley civilization was the largest Ancient
civilization in terms of population density compared to other great
ancient civilizations of its day (Egypt, Mesopotamia, Babylon, China,
Persia etc) and ACTUALLY PREDATED THOSE CIVILIZATIONS BECAUSE IT DATED
BACK TO 7500 BCE! It stretched FROM INDIA TO AFGHANISTAN AND PARTS OF
IRAN!


The Indus Valley civilization was contemporary with Egypt and
Babylon/Mespotamia and was one of their major BIGGEST trading partners;
the Sumerians and Egyptians wrote everything that they could about
daily events on paper or on hieroglyphics, so if a massive population
migration of Aryans happened, there would be a written record of such an
event happening by them which we don't find any evidence of and there
isn't a simultaneous invasion occurring in the Ancient Sumerian and
Persian regions. If any Aryan migration happened to India, there would
have been an equivalent migration into Ancient China which is right next
door to India and is surrounded by the same geographical barriers as
India and yet there is no evidence of it occurring there according to
AMT proponents which undermines AMT.


Fifthly horses and wheeled vehicles is associated with the Aryan
migration theory, and yet horse drawn carriages and wheeled vehicles and
chariots have been found In Indus Valley sites. Horses were
domesticated in Africa and used in parts of the Middle East
independently of the Aryans, yet the horses used in ancient and medieval
India was completely different and weaker then the Eurasian horses used
in Central Asia supposedly by the Aryans, negating Aryan introduction
of horses. The first wheeled vehicles and chariots appears in Africa,
India and the Middle East independently of the Indo-European peoples and
which they adopted from those sources which negates AMT.

Sixthly the caste system has actually been distorted and highly
obfuscated by British and European colonialists to the state of it
today. The caste system in Ancient India was highly flexible and fluid,
and members of different castes moved up or down castes depending on
their state and actions in life; it had nothing to do with race or color
or creed and there is no mention of a race-based caste system in
Ancient India, except by false translation and distorted European
published texts of Ancient Indian texts. Also Ancient Japan, Egypt,
Meso-America, and the Babylonians/Assyrians practiced and had social
religious caste systems and yet their civilization had nothing to do
with migrating Aryans and were not invaded or involved with them in
anyway; which again disproves the Aryan migration theory. Even the word
"caste" did not originally exist in Ancient India, and was actually
introduced by the Portugese to the world, based on their word for mixed
race people in their colonies "castas".


Seventhly India is surrounded by formidable geographical barriers and
terrains and environments and climates and diseases. When the Mongols
attempted to invade India, they found that their horses could not cope
with the high temperature and high sunlight tropical environment of
India and their bows and arrows stopped working due to the high
temperature and humidity of India hence their failures there. When
Alexander the Great attempted to invade India, they ran into all sorts
of hurdles, from their soldiers not being able to traverse the tropical
and mountainous geographical barriers surrounding India but also due to
tropical diseases and insects in India, as well as their soldiers and
animals having problems trying to traverse the river systems and monsoon
lit environment of India.

When ones looks at a genetic map of Europe, and looks at how long it
took for Indo-European languages to spread throughout Europe, you will
see that it took 15-30 years approximately for Indo-European corded ware
peoples to spread from a country like Ukraine to Denmark and that
Western Europe is mostly of R1b genetic haplogroup while Eastern Europe
and North-East/Central/North-Central Europe primarily of genetic
haplogroup R1a (aka Indo-European genetic haplogroup etc). And there are
still non-Indo-European speaking peoples that still exist in Europe
today like the Basque, Finns, Magyar-Hungarians etc etc. The reason for
all this being the reality in Europe, is because of mountainous and
geographical barriers such as the Alps, Pyreenes, Carpathian Mts etc etc
and because Europe was highly forested and uncultivated in the times of
the Kurgan corded ware peoples.

And yet India and Southern Asia is surrounded by MORE FORMIDABLE
GEOGRAPHICAL BARRIERS AND MOUNTAINS AND FORESTS THEN EUROPE IS FROM AFRICA AND ASIA! India and South Asia is surrounded by one of the
biggest mountain ranges and complexes in the entire world, bigger then
the European alps and European mountains. India ALSO HAPPENS TO
SURROUNDED BY A LARGE DESERT CALLED THE THAR DESERT! The Thar desert is one of the biggest deserts in the world not as big as the Sahara desert
but comparable in size to the Gobi desert in China. The Sahara desert
acted as a giant barrier for Europeans since they could not traverse or
bypass it on land hence why the Portugese had to find sea routes around
Africa.

It's highly unlikely that given these geographical challenges and
hurdles and obstacles that one had to face to get to India and Southern
Asia from Central Asia and Siberia (the original homeland of the
Proto-Indo-European peoples) that a pre-bronze age and bronze age
illiterate peoples whom did not even know of formal agriculture and city
building and writing and metallurgy, whom could not even bypass
European mountain ranges and forests to spread themselves; could bypass
these geographical barriers surrounding India, combined with the fact
that the environment of Ancient India would been a complete anathema and
death sentences to the Northern Eurasian animals and horses that the
supposed Aryans would have brought with them.


This makes an Aryan migration into India highly improbably and
fantastic, because according to AMT, it took 15-30 years for IE
languages to spread throughout small areas in Europe but it took a
shorter time for it spread THROUGHOUT INDIA DESPITE INDIA BEING MORE
GEOGRAPHICALLY CHALLENGING THEN EUROPE! This is highly unlikely and
negates AMT!

Lastly, the reason why North Southern Asia (North India, Pakistan,
Afghanistan, Nepal etc) may have lighter skinned people is because of
climatic adaptation and not because of a migration of Aryan pale
peoples. Also there are significant populations of dark skinned people
in Northern India, and throughout Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Nepal, as
dark as South Indians and yet according to AMT these people should not
exist in large numbers in these locations due to AMT. This negates and
goes against AMT!

The Aryan migration theory is entirely false and a fraudulent idea and
theory with no real genetic and archeological and logical evidence and
backing to support it, and is largely propagated by lies and deceit and
by repetition and brainwashing by outdated academia and incompetent and
unqualified teachers. There is no a shred of credibility or realism
behind Aryan migration theory AT ALL! The reason why it's still
supported is largely due to massive ignorance..."

[end quote]