Notes

Race Realism is not a new concept, nor is it a novel one.
It's essentially just a recycled form of Social Darwinism from the 17th.
It's not even really relevant to be discussing.
It's intellectually dishonest to try and base your arguments off of bogus social science.

I don't really disagree with your stats about crimes and IQ, it's just that there is no proof that it's 100% genes. (See my studies to know more about heredity and genes)

But NOOOOO, only "liberals" has political agenda, only SJW disagree with race realism,
it's impossible to race realist to have a political agenda too right?
There is only ONE EVIL in this world and ONLY ONE GOOD SIDE right?

The only peoples who're interested by this flawed concept are people who want to feel better about themselves like whites, asians.
Or people who want to play the victims like blacks, indians (it's not our fault, we didn't decide about our genes, DINDU)
Most of them don't know a damn thing about genes, about humans body.

For examples, the hela cells.
It's what's known as an immortal cell line.
It has been used all over the world in scientific research.
It is the most famous and the most influential cell line on earth.
It has saved millions of lives.
And it came from black women, if the mainstream media were interested enough by this, black women would know more about it and do the same thing as white supremacist, claim supremacy.

The problem with race realist, it's they use some correct facts to spread false propaganda.
Mass immigration, terrorism, their criticism against them are correct, immigration should benefit first the country which receive migrants.
Mass Immigration isn't good at all, even if it's only with good people, because it damage the job market.

That's why Europe does nothing when Saudi Arabia sent refugees to them, and built Mosque in their countries, try to spread islam, because they receive a lot of money from Saudi Arabia.

Their whole program is to spread Islam through the world, and the religion allows them to do it by any means necessary.
They have been doing it for 1400 years, by the sword, politics, money, immigration, etc. The worst thing is that they have massive funds and influence right now. Why do you think Afghanistan was destabilised, then Iraq, the Syria, these countries were destroyed economically and politically by extremists funded directly by them. Do that and you send the desperate people of these countries to the only countries that have actual compassionate people in them, then the Saudi fund the spread of Islam there, by building mosques and sending clerics. Why don't Saudi take refugees? Correct! because that would defeat the point.

That's why countries like Australia, New Zealand work well with immigration, because it's a meritocratic immigration, an controlled immigration.
Their young generation are said to be race blind.

Europe do not care about that, that's why they accept a lot of migrants, to have cheap workforce, also, rising the population with migrants help to drop a lot the cost of jobs for company, because if they have more demands of jobs, they have better control on solary (If you want to be choosen for this job among 100 persons wanting the same job, you can be willing to have a cheaper salary). China proved that their governement do not need to give their people great condition for life to gain a lot of money.

Same for holocaust denier, they use a correct criticism like the number of killed jews, which might be exagerated by victims, to spread false propaganda like denying the holocaust entirely.
I can't even count the number of time that /his/ debunked quotes/photos/documents which are supposed to prove them right.
Dailystormer should learn to photoshop in a more credible way.
So the question about jews isn't objective, in history, they gained a lot of money, helping them to be at the top, some of them do have a "racial mind", israel is questionnable in a lot of ways, but it does not goes against my claim, it mostly resolve around money.

SJW, who wish for more minorities in movies/games/comics just to appear as THE GOOD GUYS WHO HELP ALL PEOPLE, THE WORLD, they seems to be closer to colonialist than they think.
They're more racist than they think, seeing minorities as opressed people who need more times in medias, IT'S THE OTHER FAULT OH POOR MINORITIES, NEVER YOUR FAULT.

Just like Jules Ferry who wanted to help blacks because, I quote here, they're "inferior", because "it's the DUTY of the SUPERIOR race to HELP the INFERIOR one"
IT'S NOT YOUR FAULT BLACKS! IT'S JUST YOUR GENES!
Race realist claim that they're naturally attracted by other whites, by instinct.
That they don't need to be right, their instinct tell "the truth"

This is why when legitimate scientists like Bruce Lahn propose harebrained race realist theories,
they get shot down by other scientists.
Not because of political correctness, but because they uncover deep flaws that invalidate or falsify the theory.

First, there is no political correctness with science, there is political correctness with medias but not with science, otherwise, works like those from Richard Lynn wouldn't have been published, who give fuel to race realist. (and we discovered later that he has made up data and several leaps)
Most of the scientific community refuses to talk about or even debate flat earthers.
It's not because as race realists think there is some conspiracy there or that they are afraid of breaking taboo, science has NEVER been afraid of that.
It's because the scientific community thinks that it isn't worth their time discussing.
Only their opinion is not popular in many places and people speak out against it. Freedom of speech and the internet lets them still express their ideas.

But, they're right about one thing, there is biological differences between humans, race is real, but not in the way they think.
Company like genealogical companies can do even better than pointing out your ancestry.
They can determine, for example, whether someone whose ancestry can be traced to Nigeria is Igbo or Yoruba.
So if race is so real, why aren't Igbos and Yorubas different races?
Why do race realists insist on only 3 or 4 races?
If they stayed true to their convictions, they should clamor for 3,000 or 4,000 or even 10,000 races?
Why do race realists lump all blacks together?
Why do they lump all whites together?
Don't they want REALISM in human racial classifications?
Why set an arbitrary number of 3 or 4 when the underlying genetics can support thousands of races?


This is why race is a social construct based on actual biological difference (so yes, race is real but not in the way they think).
Because the outdated Nomenclature was not informed by underlying genetics.
The lines of separation were arbitrarily and whimsically drawn and change with time or location.
More importantly, human genetic variation does not rise to the level of discreet differentiation.
It's not even close. At the level of the genome, humans are virtual carbon copies.?

Children aren't a clone of their parents, dumb parents can breed genius, this is what we call "mutation kids".
Heredity of IQ express individually, not in a group basis, Einstein's childrens weren't as gifted as him.

These people literally think that America has the crime that it does BECAUSE of black people, or that if you just put all white people in one nation then you'd create some kind of utopia.
They see no other factor contributing than race.
Pretty interesting case because race realist always use the arrest rate to say BLACK COMMIT 50% OF MURDER, when conviction rates is lower than that, also:

http://imgur.com/a/ap0nS

Crime is dropping down since years but race realist make it sound like it's worst with time, when in fact, it was worst BEFORE.
How can they deny that? Social media, internet relates more often things from IRL like crimes.
Crime can be more observed with bigger audience than before thanks to internet, but it make people believe that crime is worst now when it's the contrary.
They think that an utopia ethnostate will resolve everything immediately.

We know this isn't true of course, Europe has been nearly homogeneous throughout history and it has had many bloody battles, some of them ironically enough over race.
The Romans thought the white people north of them were barbarians and savages, low men.
Later in history, these north european's come to think of the southern ones as low, dirtier, people.

In America, the Jewish person was once thought to have a lower IQ than 'whites' as well with Italians and Irish...and don't even get me started on WW2 and how fucked up that got in every sides.

In modern times, In UK the eastern European workers are quite segregated and were one of the reasons for Brexit.
In Asia there are deep divides between different groups, even in China.
Ashkenazi jews aren't considered European even though they have European origin and looks.
Irish were segregated in the US at times.
Some of these have changed and are changing, there were deep divides between Catholics and Protestants. This is more of a culture, and can change.