Notes

Little Known Ways To Antminer S19 Pro vs Whatsminer M30S+ Better
Abstract: We compare and work various do its stuff metrics for two of the latest and most vibrancy efficient Bitcoin mining products, MicroBTs Whatsminer M30S+ and Bitmains Antminer S19 Pro. Obviously the more costly 7nm Bitmain product is more powerful, however the miners are pretty similar in terms of output. Our data on top of a sharp three day era shows that the Bitmain miner has slightly stronger perform than the Whatsminer, however the Whatsminer appears to have innovative stability. In general, both machines are fabulous and we forecast the two companies will be in neck and neck competition higher than the adjacent few years.

Antminer S19 plus vs Whatsminer M30s

Following on from our June 2020 piece, the Battle For ASIC Supremacy, in this savings account we dive into the details of the flagship products from two of the leading ASIC manufacturing contenders. MicroBTs Whatsminer M30S+, approachable for US$1,580 and Bitmains Antminer S19 Pro, considering a list price of US$2,407. In this version we experimented when the two products, handing out each miner for three days and recording various conduct yourself metrics, such as the hashrate, aptitude usage, temperature, unassailable level and even the ventilate flow promptness from the main outlet.

It should be noted that the Whatsminer M30S+ is not MicroBTs most liberal product and a more efficient Whatsminer M30S++ has been released.

MinerReported Hashrate (TH/s)Efficiency (J/TH)
Antminer S199534.5
Antminer S19 Pro11029.5
Whatsminer M30S+10034.0
Whatsminer M30S++11231.0
Hashrate

Bitmains S19 benefit has a reported hashrate of 110 TH/s, even though the Whatsminer M30S+ can reportedly generate 100 TH/s. This is an amazing amount of hash attempts for one machine, exceeding 100 trillion attempts at finding Bitcoins block hash per second. As Figure 1 under illustrates, in the mature both miners achieved a hashrate nearly their respective intend level.

After upgrading the firmware to the latest version, the Whatsminer M30S+ achieved an average hashrate of 103.8 TH/s, 3.8% above the advertised level, even though Bitmains S19 improvement achieved 110.7 TH/s, 0.6% above the advertised figure. As the chart plus indicates, the Whatsminer obtained a more stable hashrate, considering a variance significantly less than the Bitmain product in the period. We believe to be this stability a significant factor in favour of MicroBT.

Variances in the hashrate can after that be driven by rotate scrutiny environments. In our feat the self-disciplined was suitably hot and this may have impacted the results.

Figures 2 and 3 under mix up the hashrate for each miner as reported by the mining pool, based on 15 minute windows and appropriately has forward-thinking variance.

Figure 2 Whatsminer M30S+ Pool Reported Hashrate (TH/s)

Antminer S19 gain vs Whatsminer M30S+: spirit efficiency
As Figures 4 and 5 under indicate, similar to it comes to spirit efficiency, both products performed well, in line in imitation of the advertised figures. In the grow old the Whatsminer used an average of 34.4 J/TH, 1.0% above the advertised figure of 34 J/TH. The Antminer fared slightly better, it used an average of 29.7 J/TH, 0.6% above the advertised rate.

Whatsminer high facility Mode
The Whatsminer M30S+ along with has an other of a high power mode, which we experimented taking into account for one day. As Figure 6 under shows, during this grow old the miner produced an average output of 109.4 TH/s, a significant buildup compared to normal power mode. Of course this as well as consumes more power, 3,743 W, compared to 3,331 W in usual conditions.

In tall capacity mode the Whatsminer had marginally greater than before sparkle efficiency, like an average rate of 34.3 J/TH.

Temperature Comparison
One of the most significant differences in the midst of the devices, in Bitmains favour, is the average temperature of the miners. We measured the temperature every hour, by placing an electronic thermometer 15cm away from the main expose outlet, directly in the let breathe stream. The Antminer was upon average 45.9C, going on for 10.5C cooler compared to the Whatsminer. We announce this a significant difference, in favour of the Antminer. This may be due to the Antminers belittle capacity consumption or unconventional cooling in the Antminer, which has more fans and generates a superior expose flow speed. In accessory to the Whatsminer let breathe flow temperature inborn considerably warmer than the Antminer, the Whatsminer device itself was after that significantly hotter in the period.

(Note: self-denying measured 15cm away from the miner, directly in the let breathe flow external the main exhaust)

Antminer S19 improvement vs Whatsminer M30S+: hermetic Comparison
We plus measured the level of noise generated by each machine, by placing a hermetic meter 15cm away from the miner, in a running perpendicular to the main ventilate flow. The Whatsminer was the lounder machine, generating an average unquestionable of 83.0 dB, compared to the Antminer afterward 81.4 dB. As Figure 9 below illustrates, the Whatsminer was far and wide more stable, with the Antminer solid varying vis--vis four get older as much as the Whatsminer. This is a adequately thesame description to the hashrate, where the Antiminer performs slightly better, but the Whatsminer has well along stability. It will be fascinating to see if this means that the Whatsminer proves to be more resilient higher than the long term.

Figure 9 Miner Volume (dB)

(Note: A strong meter was placed 15 cm from the miner, perpendicular to the devotee outtake)

(Measuring the level of hermetic generated by the Whatsminer M30S+)
Air Speed
In what admittedly is probably the least useful metric in this report, we measured the let breathe flow speed. Based upon an average of ten readings, one hour apart, the Antminer generated an average swiftness of 5.2 m/s, compared to the Whatsminer next 3.0 m/s.

Figure 10 Miner ventilate flow rapidity (m/s)

(Note: expose rapidity measured 15cm away from the miner, directly in the let breathe flow outside the main exhaust)

(Measuring expose speed generated by the Whatsminer M30S+)
Start-up time
A key area where we found the Antminer to be stronger is the boot time. Based upon an average of five attempts, the Antminer reached its object hashrate in a propos four minutes, while the Whatsminer took an average of as regards 27 minutes to boot up. However, this may be due to a safety feature in the Whatsminer.

Figure 11 time for miner to attain point toward hashrate (minutes)

Logistics and supply chain
One key place where MicroBT is currently excelling compared to Bitmain, is supply chain management. If one wants to purchase one of these miners now, there handily is no choice, the Antminer is not currently understandable for sale. We have spoken to numerous Bitmain clients who have complained roughly repeated shipment delays and warehouse problems. We even faced this trouble ourselves, MicroBT was skilled to concentrate on the product in a few days, even though Bitmain took not far off from five weeks, often blaming warehouse problems. The cause of this could be that TSMCs 7nm chips have supply issues combination similar to the ongoing power torture yourself at Bitmain, which is said to be impacting the logistics network.

Whatsminer vs Antminer: Conclusion
The first event to note is that the Antminer S19 help is clearly a improved more liveliness efficient machine, achieving 29.7 J/TH, far-off subjugate than the Whatsminer on 34.4 J/TH. However, MicroBT has already launched a newer product, manageable for sale now, the M30S++, next a reported efficiency of 31.0 J/TH. This is nevertheless inferior to Bitmain, however it is lovely close, especially when Bitmain uses a difficult exploit 7nm TSMC chip, compared to MicroBT using a belittle conduct yourself 8nm Samsung chip. It should then be noted that the MicroBT products are far cheaper and crucially, open now, though Bitmains products are sold out according to the Bitmain website.

In evaluating the relative strength of the companies and their order outlook, Bitmain yet has the cause offense edge in our view. Primarily driven by Bitmains complex brand and pronounce recognition. We have spoken to several mining farm operators and even though they are typically extremely annoyed by Bitmains supply chain issues, many of them are fervent to fasten to Bitmain without even when MicroBT. Whatsminer M30s++ is plus no question hard to get a mining farm operator to switch, as sticking to one manufacturer improves on the go efficiency and reduces child support costs.

As for the products themselves, based on the data in this report, we would conclude the companies are neck and neck, or perhaps, gone bearing in mind everything, Bitmain still has a miniscule lead.
Here's my website: https://microbt.tech/product/microbt-whatsminer-m30s-112/