Notes

Wikipedia Review Evaluation is an Net online forum and also blog for the conversation of Wikimedia Foundation tasks
Wikipedia Review is an Net forum as well as blog for the discussion of Wikimedia Foundation jobs, particularly the material and disputes of Wikipedia. Wikipedia Review is a Wikipedia guard dog site, looking at Wikipedia as well as reporting on its defects. It supplies an independent discussion forum to talk about Wikipedia editors as well as their impact on Wikipedia content. At its peak, participants consisted of current Wikipedia editors, former Wikipedia editors, individuals banned from Wikipedia, and also people that had never ever edited.

The website was founded in November 2005 by "Igor Alexander", and hosted by ProBoards. On 19 February 2006 it transferred to its very own domain name utilizing Invision Power Board software program. The website required enrollment making use of a legitimate e-mail address to publish as well as blacklisted e-mail carriers that permitted anonymity so regarding prevent the procedure of several accounts by a single customer.

Wikipedia Evaluation was cited for its conversation of wiki-editing principles and its involvement in the evaluation of the Palo Alto Research Business's WikiDashboard.

Discourse
Wikipedia Review is not a conspiracy, a team-building workout, a role-playing game, or an experiment in collusion. It is not meant as a resource or training school for those that would certainly infuse worry as well as anguish in others. It does not exist to corrupt, however to reveal corruption; it does not exist to tear down establishments, however to expose the ways in which organizations are taken apart; it does not exist to dislike, however is implied to expose hate in others. To reveal these points is not wicked. It is not a monolithic entity, neither the amount of its parts. Like-mindedness does not indicate selfhood of purpose; respect for the rights of one team does not indicate disrespect for the rights of one more. It is not planned to be predictable, consistent, or plain.

Visualize Visite Site reviews in which human beings are not user accounts, are not programmable, and are not mere words on a display screen. That's what we're doing ...

-- Declaration made when the website was out of service in 2008, Wikipedia Testimonial
Seth Finkelstein wrote in The Guardian that Wikipedia Testimonial has offered a prime focus for examination into Wikipedia-related matters such as the "Essjay conflict". Cade Metz, composing for The Register, credited Wikipedia Review with the discovery of a exclusive mailing list that brought about the resignation of a Wikipedia manager; he also composed that a Wikipedia proposition called "BADSITES" intended to outlaw the mention of Wikipedia Review as well as comparable sites on Wikipedia. The Independent noted that "allegations against particular managers came to a head on a website called Wikipedia Evaluation, where individuals dispute the administrators' activities." The Irish technology website Silicon Republic suggested seeing Wikipedia Evaluation in order to " adhere to conflicts, conversations, editors as well as general bureaucracy on Wikipedia". Philip Coppens made use of blog posts made on Wikipedia Evaluation to aid build a record, published in Nexus Publication, on WikiScanner and claims that intelligence agencies had actually been using Wikipedia to spread disinformation.

Material as well as framework
Wikipedia Evaluation's publicly obtainable online forums are broken up into four basic subject locations:

Forum details;
Wikimedia-oriented conversation, which includes subforums concentrating on editors, the Wikipedia administration, meta conversation, short articles and general Wikimedia-focused subjects not fitting somewhere else;
Media online forums consisting of a news feed as well as discussion about news as well as blog sites including Wikipedia/Wikimedia; and
Off subject, non-Wikimedia related conversation.
Referrals

Website: http://nixsolutions.events/