Notes

fast file site
fast file site
Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud has to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.

Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.

When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.

In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

Compared to the next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for a few selected sound sources. Another cloud only needs to be in a folder.

You must share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive appears like an area drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, which is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks in it. It's much better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***

It is extremely specialized in playing music. Specifically, it is the only cloud that can play sound sources within an environment much like MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play up to 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often take off at that point)

It includes a large capacity. It is just a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, if a picture is contained in a document, it really is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And if you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. So when it's in that state, you need to discover the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Aside from those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.

It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. It is just a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to connect with other Google services such as Gmail.

If you don't upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos could be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.

There are probably the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a small pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it's a block after a large amount of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.

If you use Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and use MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, but it is still crude compared to office programs used on computers.Is it obvious?)


Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify until the start of playback. It's the best in the world in terms of media reading.

There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.



The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit that could be uploaded from the free account is the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.

The starting capacity may be the smallest. p2p 순위 Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity is the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...

You will find a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected in real time when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you want to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you want through the app drive and work on it leisurely.

Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents may also be flipped over the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.

File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to talk about data conveniently with little usage of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on some type of computer than listen to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it is better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).

It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a bit slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.
Homepage: https://www.nandadisk.com