Notes

Wikipedia Review Evaluation is an Web discussion forum and blog for the conversation of Wikimedia Structure jobs
Wikipedia Testimonial is an Net online forum and also blog for the discussion of Wikimedia Foundation tasks, in particular the material and also disputes of Wikipedia. Wikipedia Review is a Wikipedia watchdog website, scrutinizing Wikipedia and also reporting on its imperfections. It offers an independent online forum to talk about Wikipedia editors as well as their influence on Wikipedia content. At its height, individuals consisted of existing Wikipedia editors, previous Wikipedia editors, users banned from Wikipedia, and also people who had actually never edited.

The website was founded in November 2005 by "Igor Alexander", and also organized by ProBoards. On 19 February 2006 it transferred to its own domain name utilizing Invision Power Board software application. The website needed enrollment using a valid e-mail address to upload and also blacklisted email providers that enabled anonymity so regarding dissuade the procedure of multiple accounts by a single user.

Wikipedia Evaluation was mentioned for its discussion of wiki-editing principles as well as its engagement in the assessment of the Palo Alto Study Company's WikiDashboard.

Discourse
Wikipedia Review is not a conspiracy theory, a team-building workout, a role-playing game, or an experiment in collusion. NIX-reviews is not implied as a source or training school for those that would infuse worry and anguish in others. It does not exist to corrupt, however to expose corruption; it does not exist to tear down organizations, yet to subject the methods which institutions are taken down; it does not exist to despise, however is implied to expose hate in others. To subject these points is not bad. It is not a monolithic entity, nor the amount of its parts. Like- Look At This reviews does not imply singularity of objective; regard for the legal rights of one group does not imply disrespect for the civil liberties of another. It is not meant to be foreseeable, regular, or boring.

Imagine a globe in which humans are not individual accounts, are not programmable, as well as are not mere words on a display screen. That's what we're doing ...

-- Statement made when the website was out of service in 2008, Wikipedia Review
Seth Finkelstein wrote in The Guardian that Wikipedia Testimonial has provided a centerpiece for examination right into Wikipedia-related matters such as the "Essjay debate". Cade Metz, writing for The Register, attributed Wikipedia Testimonial with the discovery of a personal mailing list that resulted in the resignation of a Wikipedia administrator; he additionally composed that a Wikipedia proposition called "BADSITES" intended to ban the reference of Wikipedia Testimonial and also comparable sites on Wikipedia. The Independent kept in mind that " claims against particular managers came to a head on a website called Wikipedia Review, where individuals question the administrators' actions." The Irish innovation site Silicon Republic recommended checking out Wikipedia Evaluation in order to " comply with disputes, conversations, editors as well as general bureaucracy on Wikipedia". Philip Coppens used blog posts made on Wikipedia Evaluation to help create a report, published in Nexus Magazine, on WikiScanner as well as allegations that intelligence companies had been utilizing Wikipedia to spread disinformation.

Material as well as framework
Wikipedia Evaluation's openly obtainable online forums are separated right into 4 basic topic locations:

Forum information;
Wikimedia-oriented discussion, which has subforums focusing on editors, the Wikipedia bureaucracy, meta conversation, posts and also basic Wikimedia-focused topics not fitting somewhere else;
Media online forums having a news feed and discussion about news and also blog sites featuring Wikipedia/Wikimedia; and
Off topic, non-Wikimedia related conversation.
References

Homepage: https://www.businessofapps.com/app-developers/nix-united/