Notes

Intelligent Design/ Creationism is censored.
Science is best learned when students are asked "to discriminate
between evidence that supports... or does not support"
However, the supporters of Darwinism singles out evolution
as the only topic where different viewpoints aren't allowed.
Dawinism supporters brand scientific views they dislike as
"religion" and scare people from providing evidence that proves
otherwise.

"taking the separation of church and state- a good thing- and abusing
it to promote censorship"

Even scientists who are not advocates for intelligent design,
have presented many criticisms and doubts about evolution.
"Darwin's theory had provided no discernible guidance,
but was brought in, after the breakthroughs, as an
interesting narrative gloss."
"scientific journals now document many scientific problems
and criticisms of evolutionary theory and students need to
know about these as well."

The textbooks should not be censored. Students should
be presented with both viewpoints and evidences for each
side because intelligent design is a valid scientific question.

First Amendment violated- access to scientific information
required.