Notes

donwload site
what's webhard?
When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud has to be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.

Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as another cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.

In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

When compared to next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. Another cloud only has to be in a folder.

You need to share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, there exists a saying that N drive appears like an area drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks on them. It's far better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***

It is very specialized in playing music. Specifically, it's the only cloud that can play sound sources within an environment much like MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play around 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)

It has a large capacity. It is a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services as a whole, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, if a picture is within a document, it is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And when you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you need to find the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to talk about is folder sharing. p2p 순위 Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Except for those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.

It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you focus on can continue to be reflected in the cloud instantly. It is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to interact with other Google services such as for example Gmail.

If you don't upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.

There are the most apps that could be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it's a block after a large amount of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.

If you use Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and work with MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs used on computers.Could it be obvious?)


Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a certain amount of buffering time for every photo). However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It is the best in the world when it comes to media reading.

There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.



The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit which might be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.

The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity is the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There is a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected instantly when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself can't be documented.

There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you want through the app drive and work on it leisurely.

In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped on the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.

File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little usage of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is very disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on some type of computer than listen to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it's much better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).

It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a bit slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.
Here's my website: https://www.nandadisk.com