Notes

Let's look at the pros and cons of rental and built-in donwload site
Let's look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies something that shares idc's server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type gets the advantage of having a server on idc, so it doesn't have to be managed separately, and the original setting cost is low.

However, you must pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.


Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It has the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard isn't just a Webhard, it is a company.

It is because it is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.


Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.
It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the answer alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had an internet site or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work which used to run the site.

OK to set up installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage in addition to the Webhard's original function, the thought of creating a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the perfect solution is.

The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, which is often fully built in Soho, therefore the parts which were agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.


It is now necessary for Soho to establish a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.


Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Online sites that allows one to download files over the Internet at a set monthly cost. Therefore using web hard is becoming common.



But it's not just lately that this concept arrived, and it's true that it's been a long time. When it came out, lots of people used it, and there have been many workers in offices who didn't join it or even paid for their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.



The biggest background of the phenomenon is the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. In addition, the service is provided against the backdrop of a large portal, which also leads to security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company refuses to adopt it.


In some cases, additionally, there are many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses using the number of users), which is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.



NAS supplies a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly decrease the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative since it supports uploading files by default. It's a really good feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside without needing to buy an authorized IP.



Unfortunately, there are functional limitations because the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it's not a webhard solution developed at a high cost. 웹하드 순위 As a result, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it's a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very helpful solution that's less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.


Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll have a look at the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the best one according to the reality and needs.
Homepage: https://mongfile.com