Notes

From a dethatched stand-point, is it not better to instead promote an interpretation that does work against all the ones that clearly don't?
Instead of demanding that people listen to you (one way) and that they become something that is antithetical to their nature.
All Christians ought to be willing to make more sense of things, since I know full well from experience that they stand on unsteady ground.
You really can't judge it as a 'model' of mythos to teach lessons through generations though... because it's not that kind of Book.
It's supposed to be true, so if it's not true, it's no use at all, you may as well not believe it.
So how much faith do you want to put in Modern Science which aligns perfectly with Kabbalah?

You think that we haven't heard all this stuff before, from many atheists growing up?
Can you not think of a more actively despised and unprotected faith to choose from in Western countries?
I don't know the specifics of what DOA believes but it has to be something similar to what I understand to even get to that point.

Much of Christianity is foolish, yes, I agree, fools interpret foolishly and there are many fools, and only over generations can we learn from certain mistakes, but NS Germans weren't Neo-pagans, they kicked them out along with other Freemasonic divisives like New Agers. Your rose-tinted glasses ignore all the records (often self-admitted) of actual historical Paganism that don't fit in with your worldview, it wasn't as happy or as intellectual, or moral as you guys like to make out.
You'd be trading one hell for another, because you can't accept that there may be strength outside of competitiveness and brutality.
I've tried discussing it but they find excuses to dismiss the issues.

NIETZSCHE - https://i.imgur.com/RgBP6FX.jpg
Interesting, no?
Still, his criticisms, if valid, shouldn't be ignored for the sake of comfort.
He was undoubtedly a large influence in not just Germany.

You think it is the book that is the problem when other atheists complain about it promoting violence among other things...
It is not the book that is the issue it's the people who are more willing to take on "Ethnomasocistic" views and see themselves as villains, because they have not only been raised/ conditioned that way, they have also an odd nature to them. No other people would have taken the Bible and interpreted it this way, or even been convinced to see it in that way...they would have chosen to interpret in an ego-boosting manner. It's just a very odd way to see things given how many elements of the Bible it contradicts when you read it in full, with proper translations and you properly research it like it's a historical artefact.
Well, actually the nations who adopted Buddhism may have adopted it in a similar self-sacrificing manner.

The good side of European Paganism does exist, in my eyes, as odd as that may seem.
For one, the sacred symbols used have been perverted, they are found in nature, which is why they are compelling, but they are now used to refer to pantheons or to magic arts as glyphs, or to some other mystical esoteric notion.
Multiple factions interpret the same symbols very differently. Same with specific colours.
Secondly, I know that the Indo-European populations are Shemites (like the original Babylonians and what they scribed down as "Aratta")- not Japhethite, for if they were of Japheth, they would fulfil the prophecy according to Japheth, instead of Shem.
So these qualities that separate European paganism from other shamanic practices in the world, they are reflections of the people, who had specific divergent traits and therefore made different understandings/ interpretations and fabrications.
People don't get this because they look at the dark Babylonians and Arabs/ Iranians and ignore what the Scribes said (that they mixed with the Dilmun, who migrated West from the East, from the Indus Valley. But were blonde prior to that.)

You have to ask yourself why Germanics (Scythes) were recorded by the Greeks as disdaining Pigs and the eating of Pork... Why- when they were related to the Greeks would this be an issue?
So that leads me on to the topic of the Tribes of Yisrael who were scattered, who had betrayed God and become a type of pagan when hey had their identities stripped-
it makes sense that they'd end up not only around and above the Caucasus where some escaped Assyrian captivity, but also along the Phoenician maritime trade routes (which go way up into Europe, but was especially present in Dumnonia/ Devon & Cornwall).
In the end Yehudah also did the same thing and were overtaken by malicious interlopers and then used/ abused until Christ came- It is the ones who followed Christ who are the real Yehudah and the ones we should pay attention to, but they were integrated into other Christian populaces.

The Bible doesn't actually teach "equality of men" it teaches that all men have equal value to God as men, it teaches the sanctity of human life, and the sanctity of creation/ animal life.
It is strictly against Tower of Babyl-esque attempts of humans uniting against God.
That's not the same thing as being equal in ability, or the superfluousness or replacableness of family/ nation.
Mankind's actions are what define them and they are given Free Will by God (not the 'talking snake'), which means it is a meritocracy- not only that but it teaches us that we inherit much from our forefathers, the results of their actions & desires affect us generations down the line, and the blessings and the promises given to them are also passed on.
Were the Canaanites equal to the Yisraelites? Hmm-

Over time the factions of Christianity that were lesser evils were favoured over the others-
1Co 11:19 "For there have to be factions even among you, so that the approved ones might be revealed among you."
But -
Mar 3:25 “And if a house is divided against itself, that house is unable to stand."
It also teaches that God ordained hierarchy MULTIPLE times, but it is intended to be balanced in such a way that the Greater is supposed to voluntarily serve/ care for and minister to the Lesser- Like God/ Christ did for his people. Does the Bible teach that women are equal to men or does it teach that a father is the head of the family?
How is blessing Shem & Japheth (and their offspring) but cursing Canaan equitable to "equality of mankind"?

Also do not mistake the J*w for the people of the Bible. In the past they were Idumeans who had established a power base within, although at this point they're more like a completely mixed-r*ce Order of Bloodlines, they encompass almost every ethnic relation. They also track Maternally and are mostly Lactose Intolerant which is a big give away.
Eur*peans are the ones who single-handedly maintained and spread the Bible across the world- it has nothing to do with our enemies.
Without British Archaeologists and Linguists, the Yids wouldn't have been able to resurrect the dead language of Hebrew, so they'd be stuck with their hustling merchant language, but I suppose the entire reason for that was because Brits were won over by their lies/ teachings and also enslaved by usury, even back then.

Monotheism is the problem?
You do realise J Kabbalists are Gnostics? That means they are essentially eclectic, hence the whole New Age "COEXIST" angle?
Take a look - (By Carlile Richard) https://i.imgur.com/bK494tN.jpg https://i.imgur.com/OEmfu94.jpg
Have you been paying attention to what they are pushing and the narrative they are forming in the masses' minds?
They want to be at the centre of that heap of a mess as it's ascended magi, a material apotheosis, and it doesn't seem to matter what guise they take on, just as long as it functions well.
They also want to scapegoat their enemies- as they have done for thousands of years in ritual bloodshed.
You don't have to be monotheist to be a Freem*son btw, you just have to not be a genuine atheist.
It's very much like how Hinduism actually has one single God, but it has many different deities that make up that one God, and people can worship whichever deity according to their desires, and it is all the same, somehow. Except they believe in a demiurge who is both primarily 'Saturn' and also the "Lightbearer" as well as all other deities.
They- like the Egyptians believed of the "Foregin kings" or "Nomads" that we worship Set/ Saturn, who is a nasty authoritarian oppressor, who won't let them have a libertine world where they can do what they want and it always works out no matter how aberrant or harmful it is. There are some factions who outright worship this scarecrow figure of God called Set/ Saturn, and they are Kabbalists too, people who practice Black Magic because who the hell knows why. It is all blasphemy.


The J*ws are deceitful by nature, yet people take them at the word, despite how many times they have the chutzpah to lie to our faces.
They do not even see themselves as what they lead others to believe- because they, who are operators and leaders, know full well what they are, and it was proven when their profaned temple was destroyed by the very people they were attempting to destroy through subversive means.
I know you are likely an atheist LARPer, and it's more about principles, but if you believed in the paranormal, then you'd also realise that the people who interact with spirits/ unknown interdimensional entities are often absolutely devoid of sanity, it only takes a bad omen or a nasty aura for them to go off the handle- Only Christianity makes sense of all this chaos, from 'aliens' to 'nature spirits,' all the seemingly contradicting lies that are loaned tangible power.
Light and Dark are not equal opposites. Darkness is the absence of Light, just as Chaos is the absence of Order.


Yes, God created the entirety of this universe for humanity, does that make us conceited? Are you worried about offending extra-terrestrials?
lol
The idea is not about self-worship it is rejection of self-worship, and animism, and of mysticism/ magic arts/ spiritism/ divination/ superstition- and have gratitude to God & a concrete understanding of God's predicament. People have warped the Bible to mean "It doesn't matter what you do, he will always forgive you, if you apologise" -- uh, no that's completely incorrect. It teaches that you should take responsibility for your own actions & repent (which Adam & Eve didn't do when confronted, which was the primary reason for their punishment), which is to say that you need to learn why it's not beneficial or part of God's will and learn not to do it again, but there is a difference between defiant sin and mistaken sin.


The Principle of the Bible are founded in Strong Family units, and principles such as Righteousness, Enduring Will, Compassion, Truth/ Honour, Justice, Civility, Good Faith (suspending doubt for the sake of believing there is a greater good in this world and believing that God keeps his word), Humbleness (Don't be egotistical or arrogant) and having Meekness- which is not to be mistaken for the weakness that you see around you. You can not be weak and meek, for it requires no self-control to be keep a sword sheathed (as a last resort) for the sake of another, if you do not have a sword.
It is also like this "Just because you love your family, doesn't necessarily mean that you hate or want to injure other families, but on the contrary, you would try to do them any good turn you can."
There has to be a Divine Logic to everything for there to even be a Logic worth adhering to.
Our job is to use this logic to sort through lies and find the truth of it all.


More importantly it explains everything about our enemies and what is going on, through prophecy, but not everyone is able to understand it, which frustrates many people, but it isn't for everyone to know- as it states plainly. This is not occulting the matter by some mystical means, it's just that people from the wrong background with the wrong traits will prefer to interpret it differently or ignore it entirely, and he knew that it would take time for even his people to understand fully, but they would at least have the traits to hold on to it and try to learn from it.


If you like reading enough to get this far - https://notes.io/MGez These are Scriptural notes on the 'usual suspects'
Apologies if this didn't make sense, it's quite hard to reply to such a big set of issues, I know I missed many things.