Notes

1.Smt Ujjam Bai vs State Of U.P on 10 April, 1962

Bench: S.K. Das, J. L. Kapur, A.K. Sarkar, K. Subba Rao, M. Hidayatullah

JUDGMENT:

JUDGMENT 1963(1) SCR 778 The following Judgments were delivered S. K. DAS, J. - The facts of the case have been stated in the judgment of my learned brother Kapur J., and it is not necessary for me to restate them. I have reached the same conclusion as has been reached by my learned brother. But in view of the importance of the question raised, I would like to state in my own words the reasons for reaching that conclusion.

2.Rabinder Nath Malik vs Regional Passport Officer, New ... on 23 December, 1966

Equivalent citations: AIR 1967 Delhi 1

Author: A C Dua

Bench: I Dua, H Khanna, S Kapur

JUDGMENT Dua, AG. C.J.

(1). This petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution has been placed before us in pursuance of the referring order dated 4-11-1966 made by my learned brtoher S.K. Paur, J. Considering the matter to be important and, therefore deserving of consideration by a larger Bench.

3.Babulal Choukhani vs Western India Theatres Ltd. And ... on 5 December, 1956

Equivalent citations: AIR 1957 Cal 709

Author: P Mukharji

Bench: P Mukharji, Bachawat

JUDGMENT P.B. Mukharji, J.

1. This appeal questions the refusal by the Board of Directors of the Defendant Western India Theatres Ltd. to register certain shares transferred by defendant Shantaram Raghurao Hemmad in favour of the plaintiff Babulal Choukhani. Two essential points arise for determination in this appeal. The first point relates to the construction of the Articles of Association restricting the right of transfer and limiting such transfer by certain conditions mentioned in the Articles. The second point raises the question of proper exercise of such power by the Directors under those Articles and how far and to what extent the Director's decision in this respect is reviewable by the Courts.

4.Ramrichpal Singh vs Dayanand Sarup Minor Through ... on 6 January, 1955

Equivalent citations: AIR 1955 All 309

Author: Malik

Bench: Malik, Agarwala, V Bhargava, Mukerji, M Chaturvedi, Asthana, Mehrotra

JUDGMENT Malik, C.J.

1. These two cases came up before a Bench for hearing in the year 1949 and on 10-5-1949, they were referred to a Pull Bench as there was a conflict of opinion between the Allahabad High Court and the Oudh Chief Court on the point Whether a revision under Section 115, Civil P. C. (Act 5 of 1908) was entertainable by the High Court in a case where a Judge had refused to grant an application under Section 10 of the Code.

5.Dr Ashwini Kumar vs Union Of India Ministry Of Home ... on 5 September, 2019

Author: Sanjiv Khanna

Bench: Hon'Ble Ms. Malhotra, Sanjiv Khanna

This order would dispose of Miscellaneous Application No. 2560 of 2018 filed by Dr. Ashwani Kumar, applicant in-person, who is a senior advocate and a former Law Minister and Member of Parliament, praying for the following relief:

“In the aforesaid premises, it is therefore respectfully prayed that since no action has been taken by the Government pursuant to the statement of the Hon’ble Attorney General, the stand taken by the National Human Rights Commission and the Law Commission of India in its report of October 2017.