Notes

Let's look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in webhard
Let's consider the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type has the benefit of having a server on idc, so that it does not have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.

However, you will need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

웹하드 순위 There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.


Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not only a Webhard, it's a company.

It is because it really is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.


Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.
It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the answer alone allows users to build Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had a website or intranet, you can stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.

OK to set up installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage plus the Webhard's original function, the idea of creating a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the answer.

The price is also from 300,000 won for 30 people, and this can be fully built in Soho, therefore the parts that have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.


It is now necessary for Soho to determine a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.


Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Internet service that allows one to download files over the Internet at a set monthly cost. Because of this the use of web hard has become common.



But it's not just recently that this concept came out, and it's true that it is been a long time. As soon as it came out, many people used it, and there were many workers in offices who didn't join it or even covered their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.



The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company won't adopt it.


In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses based on the number of users), which is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.



NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly decrease the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative because it supports uploading files automagically. It's a really good feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside without needing to buy an authorized IP.



Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations as the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. Because the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a high cost. As a result, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it is a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very useful solution that's less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.


Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll have a look at the rough features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the right one according to the reality and needs.
My Website: https://www.streetfile.co.kr