Notes

Understanding International Style
The International Style is an architectural style that emerged in the 1920s and 1930s. It was closely linked to both pre-modernism as well post-modernism. The desire to express a stylized style of architecture through art was the catalyst for the development of the International Style. The styles of the period were based on a classical or monumental structure as a response to the cramped, awkward, and flat styles of the time. The Neoclassicism ideal of a classical, monumental style was the mainstay of the period's architecture. While the International Style eventually faded away in the twentieth century, it has continued to exist as a strong aesthetic movement in the world since the inception of the new millennium.

In the present there are many examples of International Style architecture. A prime example of minimalism can be seen in a lot of the modern architecture. Many buildings are designed using minimalist ornamentation. The Usui Castle, in Aomori Prefecture of Japan, is a good example of minimalist construction. It combines the characteristics of a fortress with an apartment.

In the twenty-first century, we also witness the resurgence of the International Style as a result of World War II. Japan was facing difficult economic conditions after the war and the government tried to restore its once-decadent culture in order to bring it back to. The International Style was created to promote concrete urban building construction in these difficult times. Concrete made it possible for architects to design affordable structures while maintaining the same boldness design, and flair as earlier times. This was a natural progression for Japanese urban renewal projects, which saw a lot of older buildings being destroyed in favor of flat-roofed constructions. Therefore, although many buildings bear the International Style signature, they aren't always fully authentically a representation of the grand architectural style.


The early 20th century saw an emerging trend in architecture that was focused on coordination and planning. It was not enough to just create and arrange the elements of an architectural structure. This kind of planning and coordination required a system of both external and internal coordination. บริษัท สถาปนิก Instead of relying solely on painting and typography to communicate the building's exterior and interior surroundings The International Style was essential.

This movement had its downsides. Because the planning and coordination required a lot more work than was practical in the times of economic recovering, the standards set by the International Style was often not adhered to in the new European architecture context. For instance, the usage of light and materials was different in Europe than in the United States. Many architects were dissatisfied with the latest trends, particularly because they didn't conform to the strict guidelines of international design.

However, the International Style survived into the twentieth century and became increasingly popular with architects who recognized its value as it provided more clarity to the design of interior environments. The United States' architecture developed significantly during the 20th century. It became more uniform than the earlier times. The World War I was a turning point in architectural thinking. Architectural designers on both sides of the conflict produced structures that were remarkably alike.

Experts and critics agree that modern architecture is the result of the First Wave of International Style. Modern architecture was first created for commercial purposes. They were created in a consistent manner that conveyed a sense unity. The uniformity was not without controversy. Many architects saw the uniformity of facades as an invitation for others to copy their designs even though they were clearly original. The International Style was created to combat copying of pre-war plans.

With the First Wave of International Style, the emphasis was on the aesthetic quality of the architecture , rather than its functionality or utility. Instead of focusing on how well the building would meet the requirements and desires of the people who would use it, architects who used the term "international style" instead pointed out the beauty inherent to the designs of the architecture and stressed the quality of the materials and the attention to detail displayed in the design. As the 20th century wore on, the use of the term "international style" was growing and it became synonymous with modern design and architecture that was distinguished by distinctive designs and textures as well as colors that were clearly influenced by the different cultures of the various countries that were represented in the United States. Most architects today employ some elements of the International Style in their work.

My Website: https://www.tonsilparchitect.com/