Notes

Secret Back of Technology Operating a blog
"Technology in the long-run is irrelevant". That is exactly what a customer from mine said when I built a business presentation to him about a cool product. I had been discussing the product's features and benefits and listed "state-of-the-art technology" or maybe something to that particular effect, among them. Then he made his statement. When i realized later on that having been correct, more than within the wording of how I actually used "Technology" in my demonstration. But I began thinking of whether he could be right consist of contexts on top of that.

What is Technology?

Merriam-Webster identifies it simply because:

1. a good: the practical application of knowledge especially in a particular place: engineering 2

m: a capacity given by the practical application of knowledge only two : a manner of accomplishing a job especially employing technical procedures, methods, or knowledge a few : the special aspects of a specific field from endeavor Wikipedia is it just as: Technology (from Greek τÎχνη, techne, "art, skill, clever of hand"; and -λογία, -logia[1]) is definitely the making, modification, usage, and knowledge of tools, machines, methods, crafts, programs, and strategies of organization, in order to solve a condition, improve an important preexisting answer to a problem, achieve a goal, cope with an applied input/output relative or execute a specific party. It can also reference the collection in such equipment, including machines, modifications, measures and types of procedures. Technologies appreciably affect individuals as well as other dog species' ability to control and adapt to the natural surroundings. The term can either be applied generally or to specific areas: for example construction technology, medical technology, and technology. Both upgrades revolve around a similar thing - request and utilization. Technology can be an enabler Plenty of people mistakenly believe it is technology which drives development. Yet in the definitions previously mentioned, that is plainly not the case. It is opportunity which in turn defines creativity and technology which permits innovation. Think of the classic "Build a better mousetrap" example taught in most online business schools. You might have the technology to build an even better mousetrap, but if you have no mice or the old mousetrap works well, there is not any opportunity and then the technology to build a one develop into irrelevant. Conversely, if you are overrun with mice then your opportunity is available to debut a product along with your technology. An additional example, a person with which I actually is thoroughly familiar, will be consumer electronics startup companies. As a former associated with both those that followed and those that failed. Just about every possessed exclusive leading edge technologies. The difference is opportunity. The ones that failed wasn't able to find a chance to develop a important innovation applying their technology. In reality to survive, these firms had to change oftentimes in something totally different and if these people were lucky they could take advantage of derivatives of their unique technology. By and large, the original technology wound up in the scrap number. Technology, thus, is an enabler whose greatest value don is to help with our lives. To become relevant, it takes to be accustomed to create innovative developments that are operated by option. Technology being a competitive advantages? Many companies list a technology as one of the competitive features. Is this valid? In some cases yes, but In most cases no . Technology develops along two paths - a great evolutionary course and a revolutionary path. A revolutionary technology the which permits new industrial sectors or allows solutions to conditions that were prior to this not possible. Semiconductor technology is an excellent example. Not simply did it breed new industrial sectors and products and solutions, but it spawned the creation of other cutting edge technologies -- transistor technology, integrated outlet technology, microprocessor technology. Each and every one which provide many of the product or service we ingest today. Although is semiconductor technology some competitive advantages? Looking at the quantity of semiconductor providers that exist today (with brand-new ones creating every day), I'd mention not. Why not consider microprocessor technology? Again, number Lots of microprocessor companies to choose from. How about quad core processor technology? Significantly less many companies, nevertheless, you have Intel, AMD, SUPPLY, and a number of companies establishing custom quad core processors (Apple, The samsung company, Qualcomm, etc). So yet again, not much of the competitive gain. Competition via competing technologies and easy having access to IP mitigates the observed competitive advantage of any particular technology. Android os vs iOS is a good example of how the following works. Equally operating systems will be derivatives of UNIX. Apple used their very own technology to introduce iOS and gotten an early industry advantage. Nevertheless , Google, utilizing their variant from Unix (a competing technology), caught up fairly quickly. The causes for this are located not inside underlying technology, but in how the products authorized by the ones technologies ended up being brought to industry (free or walled yard, etc . ) and the variations in the strategic visions of each one company. Evolutionary technology the which incrementally builds upon the base progressive technology. But by it is quite nature, the incremental difference is easier for your competitor to check or leapfrog. Take for example cordless cellphone technology. Company Sixth is v introduced 4-G products prior to Company Some and while it could have had a shorter term gain, as soon as Business A launched their 4G products, a benefit due to technology disappeared. The buyer went back to choosing Company A or Provider V depending on price, provider, coverage, no matter what, but not based on technology. Thus technology has been relevant in the short term, but in the future, became inconsequential. In today's world, technologies tend to quickly become commoditized, and within any particular technology lies the seeds from its own loss. Technology's Benefits This article was written on the prospective of end customer. Coming from a developer/designer standpoint issues get murkier. The further one is taken out of the technology, the significantly less relevant it is. To a programmer, the technology can look just like a product. An enabling product, but a solution nonetheless, thereby it is really relevant. Bose uses a exclusive signal processing technology to allow products the fact that meet a group of market desires and thus the technology and what it makes it possible for is relevant to them. Their customers are more interested in how this might sound, what's the price, what's toughness, etc ., and not so much with how it really is achieved, consequently the technology used is much less highly relevant to them. Recently, I was associated with a discussion at Google+ for the new Motorola X mobile phone. A lot of the people on these posts criticized the phone intended for various causes - price, locked trunk loader, and so forth There were likewise plenty of knocks and bumps on the fact that this didn't have a quad-core processer like the S4 or THE NEW HTC One which ended up being priced in the same way. What they still did not grasp is that whether the producer used you, 2, 4, or 8 cores eventually makes not any difference as long as the phone can deliver a competitive (or possibly best of class) feature established, functionality, amount, and user experience. The iPhone is among the most powerful phones at any time produced, but yet it goes on a dual core processor. It even now delivers one of the greatest user ordeals on the market. The features that are empowered by the technology are precisely what are relevant to the individual, not the technology itself. Thecitrusreport.com of technology therefore , is just as an enabler, not as something feature or maybe a competitive gain, or any numerous other things - an enabler. Looking at the Android operating system, it is an exceptional piece of software technology, and yet Yahoo gives it off of. Why? As standalone, it lets you do nothing pertaining to Google. Creating away enables other companies to apply their skills to build products which then work as enablers intended for Google's products and services. To Google, that's the place that the real worth is.

The possession of or maybe access to a technology is merely important for what it enables you to perform - develop innovations of which solve concerns. That is the actual relevance from technology.

My Website: https://thecitrusreport.com/