Notes

Wikipedia Review Testimonial is an Net discussion forum and also blog for the discussion of Wikimedia Foundation jobs
Wikipedia Evaluation is an Net discussion forum as well as blog site for the conversation of Wikimedia Structure tasks, particularly the material and problems of Wikipedia. Wikipedia Testimonial is a Wikipedia watchdog website, inspecting Wikipedia and reporting on its defects. It provides an independent discussion forum to go over Wikipedia editors as well as their influence on Wikipedia material. At its optimal, individuals consisted of existing Wikipedia editors, previous Wikipedia editors, individuals banned from Wikipedia, as well as people that had actually never ever edited.

The website was founded in November 2005 by "Igor Alexander", as well as held by ProBoards. On 19 February 2006 it moved to its own domain utilizing Invision Power Board software. The website required registration utilizing a legitimate e-mail address to post and also blacklisted e-mail companies that allowed anonymity so as to prevent the operation of multiple accounts by a solitary individual.

Wikipedia Review was mentioned for its conversation of wiki-editing ideas and also its participation in the examination of the Palo Alto Research study Firm's WikiDashboard.

Commentary
Wikipedia Evaluation is not a conspiracy theory, a team-building exercise, a parlor game, or an experiment in collusion. It is not indicated as a source or training ground for those who would certainly infuse fear and also torment in others. It does not exist to corrupt, but to subject corruption; it does not exist to take down establishments, however to expose the methods which establishments are taken apart; it does not exist to despise, yet is indicated to reveal hate in others. To subject these points is not evil. It is not a monolithic entity, nor the sum of its components. Like-mindedness does not indicate selfhood of objective; regard for the civil liberties of one group does not imply disrespect for the civil liberties of another. It is not meant to be foreseeable, consistent, or dull.

Imagine a globe in which humans are not individual accounts, are not programmable, and are not mere words on a display screen. That's what we're doing ...

-- Statement made when the website was out of service in 2008, Wikipedia Review
Seth Finkelstein wrote in The Guardian that Wikipedia Evaluation has actually offered a prime focus for investigation right into Wikipedia-related issues such as the "Essjay dispute". Click To Read , composing for The Register, attributed Wikipedia Evaluation with the discovery of a personal subscriber list that caused the resignation of a Wikipedia manager; he likewise created that a Wikipedia proposition called "BADSITES" planned to prohibit the reference of Wikipedia Testimonial and comparable sites on Wikipedia. The Independent kept in mind that " accusations against certain managers came to a head on a site called Wikipedia Review, where people discuss the administrators' actions." The Irish innovation internet site Silicon Republic suggested seeing Wikipedia Testimonial in order to " comply with conflicts, conversations, editors and also basic bureaucracy on Wikipedia". Philip Coppens made use of posts made on Wikipedia Review to assist create a report, released in Nexus Publication, on WikiScanner and also claims that knowledge companies had actually been making use of Wikipedia to spread out disinformation.

Material and also framework
Wikipedia Testimonial's publicly easily accessible online forums are separated right into 4 basic subject locations:

Online forum details;
Wikimedia-oriented discussion, which includes subforums concentrating on editors, the Wikipedia bureaucracy, meta conversation, write-ups and also general Wikimedia-focused topics not fitting somewhere else;
Media forums having a news feed and discussion concerning information and also blog sites including Wikipedia/Wikimedia; and
Off subject, non-Wikimedia relevant conversation.
Referrals

Here's my website: https://om-saratov.ru/blogi/25-november-2021-i105805-top-6-vostrebovannyx-pril