NotesWhat is notes.io?

Notes brand slogan

Notes - notes.io

 Which court or tribunal has jurisdiction over challenges on qualification of candidates for President and Vice-President: the Comelec or the Presidential Electoral Tribunal?
Grace Poe vs. Comelec, GR. No. 221697, 221698-700, March 8, 2016
 Did the designation of Agra as the Acting Secretary of Justice, concurrently with his position of Acting Solicitor General, violate the constitutional prohibition against dual or multiple offices for the Members of the Cabinet and their deputies and assistants?
Funa vs. Agra, G.R. No. 191644, Feb. 19, 2013
 Can the President be named respondent in this sui generis proceedings challenging his declaration of martial law?
Lagman vs. Pimentel, G.R. No. 235935, Feb. 6, 2018
 Can the President be named respondent for issuing Proclamation Proclamation No. 475 declaring a state of calamity in Boracay and ordering its closure for six months?
Zabal vs. Duterte, G.R. No. 238467, February 12, 2019
 Can the pardoning power of the President be limited by legislative action?
Vidal vs. Estrada, G.R. No. 206666, Jan. 21, 2015
 Can the President enter into an executive agreement, instead of a treaty, insofar as binding the Philippines to the EDCA?
 How does the Constitution limit the foreign relations power of the President?
Saguisag vs. Ochoa, G.R. No. 212426 & 212444, Jan. 12, 2016
 Was the President's ratification, without Senate concurrence, of the Madrid Protocol valid and constitutional?
IPAP vs. Ochoa, G .R. No. 204605, July 19, 2016.
 If it was a police power measure, did the President usurp legislative power by temporarily closing Boracay through Proclamation No. 475?
Zabal vs. Duterte, G.R. No. 238467, February 12, 2019
 Did petitioners' appointments violate Section 15, Article VII of the 1987 Constitution?
Garafil vs. Office of the President, G.R. No. 203372, June 16, 2015
 Can the President's constitutional power of control over all the executive departments, bureaus and offices be curtailed or diminished by law?
PSALM vs. CIR, G.R. No. 198146, Aug. 8, 2017
 In withdrawing the Special Allotment Release Order (SARO), can an undersecretary invoke the qualified political agency doctrine?
Degamo vs. Ombudsman & Relampagos, G.R. No. 212416, December 05, 2018
 Whether or not the Congress has the mandatory duty to convene jointly upon the President's proclamation of martial law or the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus under Article VII, Section 18 of the 1987 Constitution?
Padilla vs. Congress, G.R. No. 231671, July 25, 2017
 Whether or not the petitions are the "appropriate proceeding" under the Constitution?
 Is the power of this Court to review the sufficiency of the factual basis of the proclamation of martial law or the suspension of the privilege of the WHC independent of the actual actions taken by Congress?
 Whether or not the exercise of judicial review by this Court involves the calibration of graduated powers granted the President as Commander-in-Chief?
 Whether or not there is sufficient factual basis for the declaration of martial law and the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus?
Lagman vs. Medialdea, G.R. No. 231658, Dec. 5, 2017
 Did the President and the Congress had sufficient factual basis to extend Proc. No. 216?
 How many times and for how long can Con-gress, upon the initiative of the President, may extend the proclamation of martial law or the suspension of the privilege of habeas corpus?
Lagman vs. Pimentel, G.R. No. 235935, Feb. 6, 2018
 Whether or not there exists sufficient factual basis for the 3rd extension of martial law in Mindanao?
 Whether the Constitution limits the number of extensions and the duration for which Congress can extend the proclamation of martial law and the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus?
 Has Proclamation No. 216 become functus officio with the cessation of the Marawi siege?
 Whether or not the manner by which Congress approved the extension of martial law is a political question and is not reviewable by the Court?
Lagman vs. Medialdea, G.R. No. 243522, February 19, 2019
     
 
what is notes.io
 

Notes.io is a web-based application for taking notes. You can take your notes and share with others people. If you like taking long notes, notes.io is designed for you. To date, over 8,000,000,000 notes created and continuing...

With notes.io;

  • * You can take a note from anywhere and any device with internet connection.
  • * You can share the notes in social platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, instagram etc.).
  • * You can quickly share your contents without website, blog and e-mail.
  • * You don't need to create any Account to share a note. As you wish you can use quick, easy and best shortened notes with sms, websites, e-mail, or messaging services (WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Signal).
  • * Notes.io has fabulous infrastructure design for a short link and allows you to share the note as an easy and understandable link.

Fast: Notes.io is built for speed and performance. You can take a notes quickly and browse your archive.

Easy: Notes.io doesn’t require installation. Just write and share note!

Short: Notes.io’s url just 8 character. You’ll get shorten link of your note when you want to share. (Ex: notes.io/q )

Free: Notes.io works for 12 years and has been free since the day it was started.


You immediately create your first note and start sharing with the ones you wish. If you want to contact us, you can use the following communication channels;


Email: [email protected]

Twitter: http://twitter.com/notesio

Instagram: http://instagram.com/notes.io

Facebook: http://facebook.com/notesio



Regards;
Notes.io Team

     
 
Shortened Note Link
 
 
Looding Image
 
     
 
Long File
 
 

For written notes was greater than 18KB Unable to shorten.

To be smaller than 18KB, please organize your notes, or sign in.