Notes

1- Divine Hideness, Divine Hiddeness (specifically inefficacy of Prayer) ("Yet, for some reason, God wants none of us today to see any of those miracles because he "needs to remain hidden" so that he will not "taint our free wills."), Lack of evidence (all miracle claims are dubious so lack of miracles) (divine hideness?), God lets others speak for him (divine hideness) We are too tiny for anything to care about us (divine hideness / Argument from Scale from Nicholas Everitt), hiddeness of God (countless reasonable non-believers even though we would expect that any person who can believe in God has a relationship with him), The Lack of Empirical Evidence, The Argument from God’s Silence, The Argument from Reasonable Non-belief, Arguments for God aren't convincing, Divine hideness, Reasons focussing on lack of evidence, Problem of divine hiddenness

2- The problem of evil (Arguing about Gods), pointless suffering (POE), The Problem of Evil, Problem of evil, The problem of evil, The problem of evil, The problem of evil

3- Incoherent and contradictory attributes, (creator vs perfect, paradox of the stone, Theodore drange)
How can God exist timelessly? Free will argument for the nonexistence of God (FANG)The FANG argument from Dan Barker says that since an omniscient God would know its own future, and therefore its own decisions, it does not have free will and thus cannot be a personal being. Argument from incompatible attributes, Problem of Hell vs moral perfection, mercy

4- Conciousness dependent on brain and neuroscience, mind-brain connection (the mind is contingent on the brain/body so it is unlikely that God exists)

5- argument from poor design, evolution (evolution is extremely inefficient and imperfect leading to many nonfunctional and dysfunctional design) inefficiency is only important for a being who is limited in time or resources. God being omnipotent and infinite is not limited in time or resources. so efficiency is useless for God, naturalistic evolution without God guiding it is improbable anyways, Argument from poor design


6- God of the gaps, Naturalistic explanations replace supernatural or theistic explanations. God of the Gaps (Evolution) + Occam's Razor (Science and naturalism explains everything that theism with fewer assumptions so we ought to prefer naturalism. exhaustive naturalism, Oppy's book the best argument against God), Success of science (Science is extremely successful without taking God into account even though we would expect that God acts in the world in ways that science must take into account), Naturalism Predicts the Real Universe, Reasons that treat God as unnecessary, Reasons to do with science and the history of thought, Historical gods posited as explanations were fake


Bonus, useless:

Religion is Harmful and other problems (scientific, anthropomorphic, immoral) with religions (irrelevant to whether God exists.

Diversity and inconsistency of religions and God claims (some religions have proven Gods and other religions have unproven and falsified Gods that were disproven by natural theology; some religions have miracles; others do not